by
Damien F. Mackey
“Especially
significant was Petrarch's image of the Avignon papacy as the equal to the
Babylonian Captivity, the idea that the popes lived in thrall just as the
Israelites spent 70 years in captivity in Babylon, an image Martin Luther
embraced with alacrity”.
For centuries, now, comparisons
have been drawn between the biblical Babylonian Captivity of 70 years duration
and the Avignon Captivity of the Church in France of approximately the same
length of time.
At: https://www.gotquestions.org/Avignon-Papacy.html for
instance,
the question is asked
What was the Avignon Papacy / Babylonian Captivity of the Church?
with the following answer being given:
Answer: The Avignon Papacy was the time period in which the Roman Catholic pope resided in Avignon, France, instead of in Rome, from approximately 1309 to 1377. The Avignon Papacy is sometimes referred to as the Babylonian Captivity of the Church because it lasted nearly 70 years, which was the length of the Babylonian captivity of the Jews in the Bible (Jeremiah 29:10).
There was significant
conflict between King Philip IV of France and Pope Boniface VIII. When the pope
who succeeded Boniface VIII, Benedict XI, died after an exceedingly short
reign, there was an extremely contentious papal conclave that eventually decided on
Clement V, from France, as the next pope. Clement decided to remain in France
and established a new papal residence in Avignon, France, in 1309. The next six
popes who succeeded him, all French, kept the papal enclave in Avignon.
In 1376, Pope Gregory XI
decided to move the papacy back to Rome due to the steadily increasing amount
of power the French monarchy had developed over the papacy in its time in
Avignon. However, when Gregory XI died, his successor, Urban VI, was rejected
by much of Christendom. This resulted in a new line of popes in Avignon in
opposition to the popes in Rome. In what became known as the Western Schism,
some clergy supported the Avignon popes, and others supported the Roman popes.
The Western Schism gave rise to the conciliar movement (conciliarism), in which ecumenical church councils claimed authority over the papacy. At the Council of Pisa in 1410, a new pope, Alexander V, was elected and ruled for ten months before being replaced by John XXIII. So, for a time, there were three claimants to the papacy: one in Rome, one in Avignon, and one in Pisa. At the Council of Constance in 1417, John XXIII was deposed, Gregory XII of Rome was forced to resign, the Avignon popes were declared to be “antipopes,” and Pope Martin V was elected as the new pope in Rome. These decisions were accepted by the vast majority of Christendom, and so the Western Schism was ended, although there were various men claiming to be the pope in France until 1437. ….
The Western Schism gave rise to the conciliar movement (conciliarism), in which ecumenical church councils claimed authority over the papacy. At the Council of Pisa in 1410, a new pope, Alexander V, was elected and ruled for ten months before being replaced by John XXIII. So, for a time, there were three claimants to the papacy: one in Rome, one in Avignon, and one in Pisa. At the Council of Constance in 1417, John XXIII was deposed, Gregory XII of Rome was forced to resign, the Avignon popes were declared to be “antipopes,” and Pope Martin V was elected as the new pope in Rome. These decisions were accepted by the vast majority of Christendom, and so the Western Schism was ended, although there were various men claiming to be the pope in France until 1437. ….
King Philip IV ‘the Fair’
And again at: https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=8903 we
read:
The great
Italian humanist and poet Petrarch wrote of the popes during the so-called
Avignon Papacy:
Now I am
living in France, in the Babylon of the West . . . Here reign the successors of
the poor fishermen of Galilee; they have strangely forgotten their origin. I am
astounded, as I recall their predecessors, to see these men loaded with gold
and clad in purple, boasting of the spoils of princes and nations; to see
luxurious palaces and heights crowned with fortifications, instead of a boat
turned downward for shelter.
These
pontiffs — all of them French — resided at Avignon, France, instead of Rome, from
1309 to 1377. The letters of Petrarch were a reflection of his own dislike for
Avignon and his desire to see the popes return to the Eternal City. But
Petrarch's harsh caricature of the popes also has served as ammunition for
writers, critics, and heretics ever since. Especially significant was
Petrarch's image of the Avignon papacy as the equal to the Babylonian
Captivity, the idea that the popes lived in thrall just as the Israelites spent
70 years in captivity in Babylon, an image Martin Luther embraced with
alacrity. ….
[End of
quote]
I now find it rather intriguing that I had proposed in my article:
Not the Templars, but the enemies of the Jews, arrested on the 13th day of
the month
that the famous incident when King Philip IV is said to have arrested the
Templar knights, on the 13th day of a month (October), may actually have
had its origins in the story of Queen Esther, King Ahasuerus - with whom I had then
likened King Philip IV of France - and the evil Haman. More recently, I have
historically identified Haman as the Jewish king, Amon (= Jehoiachin/ Coniah). See
my article:
'Taking aim on' king Amon - such a wicked king of Judah
The drama narrated in the Book of Esther - and perhaps picked up in a
garbled fashion in the later accounts of King Philip IV and the Knights Templar
- would be cosmically ‘re-enacted’ in the great drama at Fatima, Portugal, in
1917, again on the 13th day (13th May to 13th
October), culminating in the promised great miracle. See my book:
The Five First Saturdays of Our Lady of Fatima
The stupendous Miracle of the Sun,
1917, on October 13th (same day Templars were supposedly arrested, 13 October 1307) presages the ultimate Triumph of
the Immaculate Heart of Mary of whom Queen Esther was a type.
No comments:
Post a Comment