Monday, June 4, 2012

Is there any evidence to prove the existence of the prophet, Balaam?



So Balak son of Zippor, who was king of Moab at that time, sent messengers to summon Balaam son of Beor, who was at Pethor, near the Euphrates River, in his native land. Balak said:
“A people has come out of Egypt; they cover the face of the land and have settled next to me. Now come and put a curse on these people, because they are too powerful for me. Perhaps then I will be able to defeat them and drive them out of the land. For I know that whoever you bless is blessed, and whoever you curse is cursed.”



Is there any evidence to prove the existence of the prophet, Balaam?

Eden Communications
In an unprecedented discovery, an ancient text found at Deir Alla, Jordan, in 1967 tells about the activities of a prophetnamed Balaam. Could this be the Balaam of the Old Testament?
The text makes it clear that it is. Three times in the first four lines he is referred to as “Balaam son of Beor,” exactly as in the Bible. This represents the first Old Testament prophet to be dug up in Bible lands—not his tomb or his skeleton, but a text about him. The text also represents the first prophecy of any scope from the ancient West Semitic world to be found outside the Old Testament, and the first extra-Biblical example of a prophet proclaiming doom to his own people.
Eden Communications
Balaam with Balak’s messengers
Balaam was not anIsraelite. He was hired by Balakkingof Moab, to curse the Israelites. They were camped on the east side of the Jordanriver, about to make their historic entry into the promised land. Through God's intervention, Balaam was obliged to bless the Israelites rather than curse them (Num 22-24).
Afterwards, Balaam seems to have been the cause of the Israelites' sin inNumbers 25 when they took Moabite and Midianite women and worshipped the Moabite god Baal-peor (Num 31:16).
Balaam was eventually killed when Moses sent the Israelites against theMidianites (Num 31). He is further condemned in Scripture in 2 Peter 2:15(he loved the wages of unrighteousness), Jude 11 (ungodly men ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward) and Revelation 2:14 (he taught Balak to cast a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eatthings sacrificed to idols, and to commit fornication).
The remarkable text found at Deir Alla consists of 119 fragments of plaster inscribed with black and red ink. It was among the rubble of a building destroyed in an earthquake. It seems to have been one long column with at least 50 lines, displayed on a plastered wall. According to the excavators' dating, the disaster was most likely the severe earthquake which occurred in the time of King Uzziah (Azariah) and the prophet Amosin about 760 BC (Amos 1:1Zec 14:5). The lower part of the text shows signs of wear, indicating that it had been on the wall for some time prior to the earthquake.
Written in Aramaic, the text begins with the title "Warnings from the Book of Balaam the son of Beor. He was a seer of the gods." It is in red ink, as are other portions of the text where emphasis is desired. The reference to the "Book of Balaam" indicates that the text was part of a pre-existing document and therefore the original date of the material is much earlier than the plaster text itself. Balaam goes on to relate a vision concerning impending judgment from the gods, and enters into a dispute with his listeners.
There are a number of similarities between the text and the account ofBalaam in the book of Numbers. To begin with, the events described inNumbers 22-24 took place in the same general area where the text was found. At the time of the Numbers 22-24 incident, the Israelites were camped on the Plains of Moab, across the Jordan river from Jericho. Deir Alla is located about 25 miles north of this area, where the Jabbok river flows into the Jordan valley. Balaam was from Pethor, near "the river" (Num 22:5), in "Aram" (Num 23:7Dt 23:4).
The reference to Aram has led most scholars to conclude that Balaam was from northern Syria, in the vicinity of the Euphrates river. That does not fit well with the Biblical account, however, since Balaam's home seems to have been close to where the Israelites were camped (Num22:1-2231:7-8).
In view of Balaam being revered at Deir Alla, one would expect that Deir Alla was his home. This is exactly what William Shea has proposed, based on his reading of the name Pethor in an inscribed clay tablet found at Deir Alla (1989:108-11). In this case, the river of Numbers 22:5 would be the Jabbok river and the naharaim (two rivers) of Deuteronomy 23:4would be the Jabbok and Jordan rivers.
With regard to the references to Aram, Shea suggests that the original place name was Adam, with the “d” being miscopied as “r,” since the two letters are nearly identical in ancient HebrewAdam was a town about eight miles southwest of Deir Alla, on the east bank of the Jordan river, where the Jabbok meets the Jordan.
Balaam evidently was well known as a "cursing prophet," for Balak specifically summoned Balaam for the purpose of cursing Israel (Num 22:6). Much of the Deir Alla text was given to curses uttered by the prophet. The term “shadday-gods” is used on two occasions in the text.Shadday is one of the names for God in the Old Testament, used mainly in the book of Job. Since the account of Job is set in Transjordan (Job 1:1-3), it seems that Shadday was a name used for deity in this region.Balaam used the name twice in his blessing speeches where it is translated “Almighty” (Num 24:416).
The Deir Alla text presents a problem to those who dismiss the Biblical account of the ExodusWilderness Wanderings and Conquest as legendary, as is the trend in scholarship today. It is clear that Balaam was a real person who operated on the east side of the Jordan river. He was known as a cursing prophet and continued to be revered hundreds of years after his death. His persona as revealed in the Deir Alla text precisely matches that of the Balaam of Numbers 22-24. If Balaam was a real person, what about BalakMosesJoshua and all of the other persons named in the Biblical narrative? They must have been real as well, and the events described authentic.

Recommended for further reading

  1. Dijkstra, M. "Is Balaam Also Among the Prophets?" Journal of Biblical Literature. 1995. 114: 43-64.
  2. Shea, W.H. "The Inscribed Tablets From Tell Deir `Alla". Andrews University Seminary Studies. 1989. 27: 21-37; 97-119.
  3. Wood, B.G. "Prophecy of Balaam Found in Jordan". Bible and Spade. 1977. 6: 121-24.

Related issues

Author: Bryant G. Wood of Associates for Biblical Research
Copyright © 1995, Associates for Biblical Research, All Rights Reserved - except as noted on attached“Usage and Copyright” page that grants ChristianAnswers.Net users generous rights for putting this page to work in their homes, personal witnessing, churches and schools.
Associates for Biblical Research

www.ChristianAnswers.Net
Christian Answers Network
PO Box 200
Gilbert AZ 85299         Submit your Questions



John R. Salverda comments on this article


....

The character known from the Scriptures as Balaam, almost certainly had a real existence. Evidence for his historicity comes not only from the finds at Deir Alla, but there are other sources that testify to this, rather widely known, seer. In Thrace and Asia Minor he was known as “Priapus.” The Greeks have a “myth” about him arguing with his mule that goes as follows;

Dionysus had a favorite mule who had carried him faithfully throughout his life, however, for some reason the creature had lapsed into madness and was acting crazy. So, Dionysus decided to take him to the oracle at Dodana seeking some advice about a cure. He also took Priapus as a traveling companion. Along the way, no doubt in an attempt to get the cause of the mule's strange behavior from the creature's own point of view, the god granted his donkey the ability to talk. However, Priapus immediately fell into an argument with the mule, apparently over who had the greatest sexual prowess. Well, as the donkey was winning the argument, Priapus became uncontrollably angry and began beating the miserable creature with a stick again and again until the poor animal was dead. (Hyginus, in his "Poetica Astronomica" II, 23; see also his, "Fabulae," 160) Some say that it was this talking mule, who was set by Dionysus amongst the stars as one of the Asseli, in the constellation of the Presipae (the manger), that appears within the Zodiacal sign of Cancer.

Practically every part of this Greek myth has it's counterpart in the Scriptural story of Balaam's ass. As it is Priapus who has an argument with, and beats the talking mule with a stick, it must be he who is to be identified with Balaam, who likewise complains that his ass had "mocked" him. Dionysus is to be identified with Baal-Peor, (the calf god) whom Balaam taught (to which the term “the teaching of Balaam” refers). The reference to sexuality has its’ Scriptural counterpart in the Dionysian licentiousness that was supposed to accompany the rites of Baal-Peor.

Similarly, Priapus was known for attempting to “dishonor” Hestia, the virgin goddess (the Virgin Israel?) and he would have succeeded but for the timely loud braying of the ass he rode in on which woke Hestia up (Ovid Fasti 6.319).

King Midas (from central Asia Minor) had asses ears bestowed upon him by Apollo (Apollo-Pieria?), perhaps because he had harkened unto the teachings of Balaam.

Balaam was so well known in Asia Minor that hundreds of years later in the days of St. John the revelator, and hundreds of miles away in the city of Pergamos (Western Asia Minor), people were still clinging to his teachings (Revelations 2:14).

So much for the people of Thrace an Asia Minor and their version of Balaam, “Priapus.” In Greece proper they had their own version of Balaam, an even more popular character, whom they called “Melampus.” At least three Greek settlements had their own versions of the Balaam story that they had brought with them and transferred to their Greek colonies.

Melampus was a widely known prophet who could understand the speech of animals. In each local version of the Melampus story, the native King would hire him after difficult negotiations (just as in the Scriptural rendition of Balaam‘s tale), to lift a curse. This he would do by teaching the “proper” observance of the rites of Dionysus (the calf god). This is the essence of his story told at Orchomenus, about the daughters of King Minyas, at Argos, about the daughters of King Proetus, and also the story of King “Phylacus.”

Take note of the name “Phylacus” in comparison to the name of King Balak, (Balaam and Balak = Melampus and Phylacus) After an extremely difficult negotiations period, Phylacus hired Melampus to lift a curse of sexual infertility. In this story Melampus understands the speech of animals and injures his foot/leg.

All straight from the Scriptural story of Balaam and from a distant source that actually predates the final editing (by Ezra and Nehemiah) of the Old Testament. Once again the Greek myths, (written, as I believe, by uprooted Israelites) can help to verify the scriptures.

 

-John R. Salverda






















Thursday, May 31, 2012

Jesus as the New Moses



....


[Sir Colin] Humphreys analyzed a variety of religious calendars — Jewish and Egyptian, solar and lunar — and reached his own conclusion that ties up the loose ends. It turns out that Passover began at sunset on Thursday, April 2, in the year 33, according to the calendar adopted during the Jews' Babylonian exile in the sixth century B.C. But a different religious calendar, dating back to the Jews' time in Egypt, would have Passover beginning at sunrise on Wednesday, April 1. That means Matthew, Mark and Luke could make a case for Wednesday's evening meal being part of Passover (by the pre-Exilic reckoning), while John would be justified in saying it happened before Passover (by the more recent reckoning). If his timeline is true, the Last Supper would have taken place on April 1. Jesus' main trial before the Sanhedrin would have been on April 2. The confirmation of his sentence and his appearances before Pontius Pilate would have occurred on the morning of Good Friday, April 3, followed by the crucifixion. All this would lead up to the first Easter Sunday on April 5 of the year 33. Cambridge U. Press "The Mystery of the Last Supper" analyzes the timeline of the Passion story. Many in the scientific community might see Humphreys' work as an empty exercise. They might even doubt whether Jesus was a historical figure at all. But Humphreys hopes that his analysis will be useful to scriptural scholars as well as rank-and-file believers. "For biblical scholars, it resolves the discrepancy," he told me. "We now have just the right amount of space that we need for the Gospel events." Humphreys also believes that Jesus and his followers were trying to send a theological message by celebrating the Passover on a schedule that goes back to a time before the Babylonian exile, to the era of Moses and the Exodus. "It mirrors the covenant that Moses announced," Humphreys told me. "It's cementing the message of Jesus, that he's the new Moses."

....


Taken from:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/04/19/6497928-did-jesus-eat-an-early-last-supper?lite









The Mystery of the Last Supper


Reconstructing the Final Days of Jesus




Colin J. Humphreys



University of Cambridge





Paperback



(ISBN-13: 9780521732000)



Also available in Hardback
Adobe eBook
Mobipocket eBook

Published April 2011

Available, despatch within 3-4 weeks



US $24.99

Singapore price US $26.74 (inclusive of GST)







View Frontmatter as PDF (147KB)

The Mystery of the Last Supper



Cambridge University Press

9780521517553 - The Mystery of the Last Supper - Reconstructing the Final Days of Jesus - By Colin J. Humphreys

Frontmatter/Prelims

The Mystery of the Last Supper



Apparent inconsistencies in the gospel accounts of Jesus’ final week have puzzled Bible scholars for centuries. Matthew, Mark and Luke clearly state that the last supper was a Passover meal, whereas John asserts that it occurred before the festival. The gospel narratives also do not seem to allow enough time for all the events recorded between the last supper and the crucifixion, whilst indicating that Wednesday was a ‘missing day’ on which Jesus did nothing. Colin Humphreys presents a compelling fresh account of how these inconsistencies can be explained, drawing on evidence from the Dead Sea Scrolls and Egyptian texts and using astronomy to reconstruct ancient calendars. In doing so, Humphreys proposes a new theory – that the last supper took place on a Wednesday, rather than Thursday as traditionally believed – and successfully unifies the supposedly contradictory gospel stories.



Sir Colin J. Humphreys is Professor and Director of Research at the Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of The Miracles of Exodus (2003).



The Mystery of the Last Supper



Reconstructing the Final Days of Jesus



Colin J. Humphreys



CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town,Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Tokyo, Mexico City



Cambridge University Press

The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK



Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York



www.cambridge.org

Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521517553



© Colin J. Humphreys 2011



This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.



First published 2011



Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge



A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library



ISBN 978-0-521-51755-3 Hardback

ISBN 978-0-521-73200-0 Paperback



Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.



Contents



List of illustrations

vi

Foreword by

I. Howard Marshall

ix

Acknowledgements

xii

1 Four mysteries of the last week of Jesus

1

2 Dating the crucifixion – the first clues

14

3 The problem of the last supper

26

4 Can we reconstruct the Jewish calendar at the time of Christ?

39

5 The date of the crucifixion

61

6 The moon will be turned to blood

80

7 Did Jesus use the solar calendar of Qumran for his last supper Passover?

95

8 Does ancient Egypt hold a key to unlocking the problem of the last supper?

110

9 Discovering the lost calendar of ancient Israel

121

10 Was the lost ancient Jewish calendar used in Israel at the time of Jesus?

135

11 The date of the last supper: the hidden clues in the gospels

151

12 From the last supper to the crucifixion: a new analysis of the gospel accounts

169

13 A new reconstruction of the final days of Jesus

191

Notes

197

Bibliography

227

Index of biblical and other ancient sources

234

General index

239

Illustrations



1.1 The Three Crosses. Etching by Rembrandt in 1653.

2

2.1 Bronze coin from Antioch dated year 1 of Tiberius and year 45 of Actium.

19

3.1 Advertisement in the June 1, 1954, Wall Street Journal in which some of the Dead Sea Scrolls went up for sale.

33

4.1 The appearance of the moon throughout the lunar month. (a) The waxing moon (increasing in size). (b) The waning moon (decreasing in size).

41

4.2 Observing the new crescent moon (in the evening sky).

42

4.3 The invisibility of the new crescent moon in the morning sky.

44

4.4 (a) Conjunction: the moon is between the sun and the earth. (b) First visibility of the new crescent moon. (c) Full moon. (d) Last visibility of the old crescent moon.

46

5.1 Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple. Etching by Rembrandt in 1635.

77

6.1 Why the moon can appear blood red.

87

6.2 The eclipsed moon rising over the Mount of Olives on Friday, April 3, ad 33.

92

7.1 Qumran caves.

98

7.2 The gates of heaven.

105

8.1 Map of Canaan showing the regions of Galilee, Samaria and Judah.

112

8.2 Last and first visibility of the lunar crescent.

117

10.1 The Merneptah Stele.

137

11.1 Jerusalem at the time of Jesus, showing the probable location of the Essene Gate, the Essene quarter, the last supper and the Garden of Gethsemane.

159

Foreword



For the past few years I have been following with keen interest and excitement the researches of Colin Humphreys into the last supper narratives in the gospels. Previously he had investigated the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt and the ten unusual happenings recorded as accompanying that event. He also offered a new identification of the ‘star of Bethlehem’ as a comet that appeared in 5 bc. Finally, he made a fresh attempt to date the crucifixion of Jesus by using astronomical evidence for determining the likely year and also by proposing that Peter’s reference in his Pentecost speech to the moon being turned to blood (Acts 2:20) was to a lunar eclipse in ad 33 at which the moon would indeed have had a blood-red appearance.



This new book returns to this last theme and offers a detailed study of the associated puzzles caused by the apparent discrepancy between the gospel of John and the other three gospels on the date of the last supper of Jesus. Colin’s solution is a new version of the old theory that different Jewish groups may have used different calendrical systems, together with a proposal that Jesus held his meal not on the Thursday immediately preceding his crucifixion on the Friday but on the Wednesday evening, a view that allows a more adequate period of time for all the recorded events that have to be fitted in between the meal and the crucifixion.



The result is what is sometimes called a tour de force, an unusually capable feat of bringing together a vast amount of detailed evidence and showing how there is one complex solution that can account for it all. (Sometimes I have the feeling that people use this phrase when they cannot help admiring the skill and knowledge displayed in the operation but nevertheless find the hypothesis to be ‘highly ingenious but ultimately not successful’. That negative implication should not be read into my remarks here.)



The breadth and depth of learning here is quite remarkable in that the author is Professor of Materials Science in Cambridge, and he studies biblical history as a leisure sideline, showing wide-ranging competence in astronomy (aided here by a professional), ancient calendrical studies and biblical scholarship. But difficult subject-matter is treated in a simple and readable manner so that the non-expert can easily follow the argument. The author’s enthusiasm carries the reader along almost effortlessly. Frequent summaries help to chart the path that is being followed.



Many people (such as some members of the Jesus Seminar in North America) still hold that the gospel accounts of the life and death of Jesus are implausible and unhistorical to various degrees. But current biblical scholarship is producing a series of lengthy, learned works by professionals who are united in holding that much of the story can be accorded a much higher level of historical reliability when assessed by the appropriate methods. I need only mention the monographs produced by Richard Bauckham, James Dunn, Martin Hengel (and his collaborators), Craig Keener, John P. Meier and Tom Wright, and the symposia edited by Darrell Bock and Robert Webb and by Stanley Porter and Tom Holmen. These are works of technical scholarship each running to very many pages and beyond the reach of the public generally. By contrast Colin Humphreys is writing in much shorter compass and with great clarity for a wider audience.



A very considerable part of what he says in this book would certainly command wide if not total assent among scholars. His demonstration that the last supper and crucifixion must be dated to either ad 30 or ad 33 confirms what experts generally hold, and his preference for the latter date is powerfully argued. His view that there were different calendars side by side at the time of Jesus is not new but is a carefully argued variant based on a new evaluation of the evidence. His redating of the last supper to a Wednesday shows that he is not afraid to challenge traditional opinions that are of questionable validity.



Here, then, is a book that offers a new historical reconstruction of the evidence that must be taken very seriously indeed, and biblical scholars must not assume that because it is written at a more popular level it can be ignored. If I hesitate to say that I agree with every detail of the argument or hold back from saying ‘there is no doubt that Colin has solved all the problems’, that probably reflects normal scholarly caution.



....



Taken from: http://www.cambridge.org/asia/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521732000&ss=fro

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Pentecost Sunday



Pentecost


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


“And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the LORD” (Lev. 23:15-16).


The word “Pentecost” comes from the Greek word for the “fiftieth day.” “Pente” is Greek for five. It is called “Shavout,” the Feast of Weeks (Exod. 34:22; Deut. 16:9-11) and the Feast of Harvest (Exod. 23:16) of the Day of the First Fruits (Num. 28:26).


"And thou shalt observe the feast of weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year’s end" (Ex. 34:22) .


“Seven weeks shalt thou number unto thee: begin to number the seven weeks from such time as thou beginnest to put the sickle to the corn. And thou shalt keep the feast of weeks unto the LORD thy God with a tribute of a freewill offering of thine hand, which thou shalt give unto the LORD thy God, according as the LORD thy God hath blessed thee: And thou shalt rejoice before the LORD thy God, thou, and thy son, and thy daughter, and thy manservant, and thy maidservant, and the Levite that is within thy gates, and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, that are among you, in the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to place his name there” (Deut. 16:9-11).


“Also in the day of the firstfruits, when ye bring a new meat offering unto the LORD, after your weeks be out, ye shall have an holy convocation; ye shall do no servile work” ( Num. 28:26).


Pentecost fell on the 50th day after the Passover. The Feast of the First Fruits, which fell on Sunday, the week after the Passover, was a feast of thanksgiving for the Spring crops. The feast offers thanksgiving to God for the Summer harvest (Lev. 23:15-16). The day after Passover was the Feast of the Unleavened Bread which lasted seven day. (Nisan 15-21). Pentecost was fifty days from Nisan 15 which was the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread.


It was fifty days after God delivered the Children of Israel from captivity in Egypt that He gave them the Ten Commandments and the Law, establishing Israel as a nation. On this same day, fifty days after Christ was crucified that God established the institution of the local church there in Jerusalem as Acts 2 records.


On the Day of Pentecost believers for the first time were permanently indwelled by the Holy Spirit and received the Baptism of the Holy Spirit as Jesus promised the day He ascended into heaven. (Acts 1:5-8) Empowered by the Holy Spirit believers would spread out into Jerusalem and thence to Judea, Samaria and out to the ends of the earth preaching the God.


Pentecost falls on Sunday, the first day of the week “the morrow after the Sabbath.” (See Leviticus 23:11, 23:15, 23:16) Jesus was resurrected on first day of week, on the day of First Fruits which was Sunday. The Lord began the institution of the local church on Sunday, the Day of Pentecost. Thus on this Day the first believers of this present dispensation which is called the Church Age were indwelled by the Holy Spirit and empowered to be witnesses to the Gospel. The first “Fruit” was Christ, and the second “fruits” were those saved on the Day of Pentecost and those who have believed since.


Lev. 23:17, records that two “wave” loaves of bread of equal weight were baked with leaven. These two loaves were called the “first fruits.” The loaves represent sinful man, not the Lord and the Holy Spirit, because leaven is used. It seems clear they represent the bride of Christ made up of Jews and Gentiles, both with sin, unlike the unleavened bread at Passover which represented a sinless Messiah.


The provision for the poor and needy (Lev. 23:22). After Jesus’ resurrection He appeared to His disciples and taught them during the following forty day (Acts 1:3). He told them to wait in Jerusalem until the Holy Spirit would come and indwell them in the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. Acts 2:1, says that on the Day of Pentecost the Spirit did come and gathered a harvest of over 3000 souls. This was a great harvest of souls in number that First Fruits, but the Fall harvest will be even greater at the Rapture of the Bride of Christ. The Jews could fully understand and appreciate the sequence of events of Christ’s death (on Passover), burial (during Unleaven Bread), resurrection (on First Fruits) and the coming of the Holy Spirit (on the Feast of the Harvest or Pentecost).


Jews read the story of Ruth on the Day of Pentecost, even today. It is a story of love and devotion, it centers around the harvest. The story also relates the ingathering of Ruth, the Moabitess, a Gentile woman who came to know Naomi and her God, and was accepted. On the birth of the local church, the way was paved for both Jew and Gentile to accept and be accepted as a part of the family of God.


The harvest stops with the Fall harvest. Symbolically Christians are presently in the Summer harvest and must still be working in the fields until the Lord of the Harvest comes at the Second Coming and the Fall harvest is reaped.


Those listed as present in Jerusalem on the day of Pentecost were Jewish pilgrims from different nations. They were in these various nations due to the Dispersion. They all could understand both Aramaic and Greek in addition to the language of the nation where they lived. Thus, the gift of languages (KJV “tongues”) was really unnecessary. The key was Peter’s explanation in Acts 2:14-22. He said in the “last days” I will pour out my Spirit quoting Joel 2:28. What Peter was emphasizing was that this was an event of the “last days” which clearly was identified with the Coming of the Messiah. Peter preached that Jesus was the Messiah (verse 22f). Joel 2, begins with the proclamation of the terrible “day of the Lord” which is a reference to the judgment in the Great Tribulation. There is a regathering of Israel (Joel 2:15-16) and in Joel 2:18-27, God promises deliverance and the Millennium. In Joel 2:28, which is a reference to the Millennium, that follows the Coming of the Messiah, God says there will be an out pouring of His Spirit. In view is the promise that God will restore Israel. Peter is referring to Joel’s prophecy of God’s coming of deliverance of Israel. Verse 32, says that in Jerusalem shall be deliverance.


There was no need for “tongues” because the people could have understood Aramaic or Greek, thus the miracle was done as a sign of Jesus being the promised Deliverer and Messiah. Three thousand Jews, mostly of the pilgrims from other nations, understood the message and the point Peter made and they believed and were saved. It should have been a sign to all the Jews in Jerusalem and especially to those who have cried that He be crucified. However the Jews of Jerusalem continued mostly to reject Christ. Nothing that happen on this day can be understood in any way to have been remotely like the ecstatic speech of the modern tongues movement which is simply a learned psychological behavior. The sounds produced by modern tongues speakers is not a language, but mainly randomly uttered vowels.


All Rights Reserved 1996-2012 (Cooper P Abrams III - Bible-truth.org) This work is reserved in its use only to preserve the author's ownership of his work. Any part of this work may be freely used without the author's permission for use in preaching and Bible studies. This material must not be sold and proper credit should be given.


....


Taken from: http://bible-truth.org/Feasts-Pentecost.html




Thursday, May 24, 2012

Hoshea, King of Israel






Hoshea was the 19th [we would query this number: AMAIC] and final king of the ancient kingdom of Israel. He was the son of Elah and he became king after he assassinated King Pekah. He reigned nine years in Samaria (733-724 BC). King Hoshea's army was attacked and defeated in battle by King Shalmaneser of Assyria.















100 Prophecies, explains how Bible prophecies have been fulfilled in history. Click for more information.















Assyria forced Israel to pay hefty annual taxes to Assyria. Hoshea, however, stopped paying the taxation and he asked King So of Egypt to help him break free of Assyria's power. The Assyrians responded by placing Hoshea in prison, and by besieging and conquering Samaria.























The Assyrians were brutal in their treatment of Israel. Many Israelites were killed or exiled out of the land of Israel. Many were placed in colonies in Halah, Gozan, and among the cities of the Medes. Hoshea's story is found in 2 Kings, chapters 15, 17 and 18.















Sunday, May 20, 2012

BibleGateway.com

Bible Gateway


SearchEnter the Bible passage (e.g., John 3:16), keyword (e.g., Jesus, prophet, etc.) or topic (e.g., salvation) ---Amuzgo de Guerrero (AMU)--- Amuzgo de Guerrero ---العربية (AR)--- Arabic Bible: Easy-to-Read Version Arabic Life Application Bible ---Български (BG)--- 1940 Bulgarian Bible Bulgarian Bible Bulgarian New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version ---Chinanteco de Comaltepec (CCO)--- Chinanteco de Comaltepec ---Cakchiquel Occidental (CKW)--- Cakchiquel Occidental ---Kreyol (CPF)--- Haitian Creole Version ---Čeština (CS)--- Bible 21 Slovo na cestu ---Dansk (DA)--- Dette er Biblen på dansk ---Deutsch (DE)--- Hoffnung für Alle Luther Bibel 1545 Neue Genfer Übersetzung Schlachter 1951 Schlachter 2000 ---English (EN)--- 21st Century King James Version American Standard Version Amplified Bible Common English Bible Complete Jewish Bible Contemporary English Version Darby Translation Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition Easy-to-Read Version English Standard Version English Standard Version Anglicised GOD’S WORD Translation Good News Translation Holman Christian Standard Bible J.B. Phillips New Testament King James Version Lexham English Bible The Message New American Standard Bible New Century Version New International Reader's Version New International Version New International Version 1984 New International Version - UK New King James Version New Life Version New Living Translation Today's New International Version Worldwide English (New Testament) Wycliffe Bible Young's Literal Translation ---Español (ES)--- La Biblia de las Américas Castilian Dios Habla Hoy Nueva Biblia Latinoamericana de Hoy Nueva Traducción Viviente Nueva Versión Internacional Palabra de Dios para Todos Reina Valera Contemporánea Reina-Valera 1960 Reina-Valera 1995 Reina-Valera Antigua Traducción en lenguaje actual ---Français (FR)--- La Bible du Semeur Louis Segond Nouvelle Edition de Genève – NEG1979 Segond 21 ---Κοινη (GRC)--- 1550 Stephanus New Testament 1881 Westcott-Hort New Testament 1894 Scrivener New Testament SBL Greek New Testament ---עיברית (HE)--- The Westminster Leningrad Codex ---Ilonggo (HIL)--- Ang Pulong Sang Dios ---Hrvatski (HR)--- Croatian Bible ---Magyar (HU)--- Hungarian Károli Hungarian New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version ---Hawai‘i Pidgin (HWC)--- Hawai‘i Pidgin ---Íslenska (IS)--- Icelandic Bible ---Italiano (IT)--- Conferenza Episcopale Italiana La Nuova Diodati La Parola è Vita Nuova Riveduta 1994 Nuova Riveduta 2006 ---Jacalteco, Oriental (JAC)--- Jacalteco, Oriental ---Kekchi (KEK)--- Kekchi ---Latina (LA)--- Biblia Sacra Vulgata ---Māori (MI)--- Maori Bible ---Macedonian (MK)--- Macedonian New Testament ---Mam, Central (MVC)--- Mam, Central ---Mam, Todos Santos (MVJ)--- Mam de Todos Santos Chuchumatán ---Plautdietsch (NDS)--- Reimer 2001 ---Náhuatl de Guerrero (NGU)--- Náhuatl de Guerrero ---Nederlands (NL)--- Het Boek ---Norsk (NO)--- Det Norsk Bibelselskap 1930 En Levende Bok ---Polski (PL)--- Nowe Przymierze ---Português (PT)--- João Ferreira de Almeida Atualizada Nova Versão Internacional O Livro Portuguese New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version ---Quiché, Centro Occidenta (QUT)--- Quiché, Centro Occidental ---Română (RO)--- Cornilescu Romanian ---Русский (RU)--- Russian New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version Russian Synodal Version Slovo Zhizny ---Slovenčina (SK)--- Nádej pre kazdého ---Shqip (SQ)--- Albanian Bible ---Српски (SR)--- Serbian New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version ---Svenska (SV)--- Levande Bibeln Svenska 1917 Svenska Folkbibeln ---Kiswahili (SW)--- Swahili New Testament ---ภาษาไทย (TH)--- Thai New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version ---Tagalog (TL)--- Ang Salita ng Diyos ---Українська (UK)--- Ukrainian Bible Ukrainian New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version ---Uspanteco (USP)--- Uspanteco ---Tiêng Viêt (VI)--- 1934 Vietnamese Bible Ban Dich 2011 Vietnamese Bible: Easy-to-Read Version ---汉语 (ZH)--- Chinese New Testament: Easy-to-Read Version Chinese Standard Bible (Simplified) Chinese Standard Bible (Traditional) Chinese Union Version (Simplified) Chinese Union Version (Traditional) Chinese Union Version Modern Punctuation (Simplified) Chinese Union Version Modern Punctuation (Traditional) Bible Book List Verse of the Day Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on email “May the God who gives endurance and encouragement give you the same attitude of mind toward each other that Christ Jesus had, so that with one mind and one voice you may glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Romans 15:5-6 NIV View in context
View whole chapter
Print Today's passage is from the New International Version. Read by Max McLean. Provided by The Listener's Audio Bible. Latest Posts from the Bible Gateway BlogToday is Ascension Day Today, May 17th, is Ascension Day—or the Feast of the Ascension—a day commemorating Jesus’ ascent into heaven. In the Christian calendar, Ascension day always falls forty days after Easter. After the resurrection Jesus returned to His disciples. We read accounts … Continue reading → New Poll: How long have you been attending your current church? We’re opening a new poll today to ask about how long you’ve been attending your current church. Did you just start going there, or have you been going there your entire life? We want to know! Take a second to … Continue reading → Link Roundup: Don’t Name Your Kids After Hosea’s Children, Wycliffe’s New Bible Quiz Game, and More Here’s a collection of links, stories, and news items that have caught our attention lately: Wycliffe Bible Translators invites you to play In Other Words, a free online Bible quiz game, and to compete for great prizes like iPads, Kindles … Continue reading → Monday Morning Scripture: 1 Peter 3:8-18 Today's Bible reading explores one of the most challenging commands in the Bible: to love your enemy and repay evil with kindness. Continue reading → Read more at the Bible Gateway Blog (What is this?)

....


Taken from: http://www.biblegateway.com/app/


Tuesday, May 15, 2012

What was the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah?



Taken from: http://www.gotquestions.org/Sodom-and-Gomorrah.html



Question: "What was the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah?"



Answer: The biblical account of Sodom and Gomorrah is recorded in Genesis chapters 18-19. Genesis chapter 18 records the Lord and two angels coming to speak with Abraham. The Lord informed Abraham that "the outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous." Verses 22-33 record Abraham pleading with the Lord to have mercy on Sodom and Gomorrah because Abraham's nephew, Lot, and his family lived in Sodom.



Genesis chapter 19 records the two angels, disguised as human men, visiting Sodom and Gomorrah. Lot met the angels in the city square and urged them to stay at his house. The angels agreed. The Bible then informs us, "Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom — both young and old — surrounded the house. They called to Lot, 'Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.'" The angels then proceed to blind all the men of Sodom and Gomorrah and urge Lot and his family to flee from the cities to escape the wrath that God was about to deliver. Lot and his family flee the city, and then "the LORD rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah — from the LORD out of the heavens. Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, including all those living in the cities..."



In light of the passage, the most common response to the question "What was the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah?" is that it was homosexuality. That is how the term "sodomy" came to be used to refer to anal sex between two men, whether consensual or forced. Clearly, homosexuality was part of why God destroyed the two cities. The men of Sodom and Gomorrah wanted to perform homosexual gang rape on the two angels (who were disguised as men). At the same time, it is not biblical to say that homosexuality was the exclusive reason why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were definitely not exclusive in terms of the sins in which they indulged.



Ezekiel 16:49-50 declares, "Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. They were haughty and did detestable things before me..." The Hebrew word translated "detestable" refers to something that is morally disgusting and is the exact same word used in Leviticus 18:22 that refers to homosexuality as an "abomination." Similarly, Jude 7 declares, "...Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion." So, again, while homosexuality was not the only sin in which the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah indulged, it does appear to be the primary reason for the destruction of the cities.



Those who attempt to explain away the biblical condemnations of homosexuality claim that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was inhospitality. The men of Sodom and Gomorrah were certainly being inhospitable. There is probably nothing more inhospitable than homosexual gang rape. But to say God completely destroyed two cities and all their inhabitants for being inhospitable clearly misses the point. While Sodom and Gomorrah were guilty of many other horrendous sins, homosexuality was the reason God poured fiery sulfur on the cities, completely destroying them and all of their inhabitants. To this day, the area where Sodom and Gomorrah were located remains a desolate wasteland. Sodom and Gomorrah serve as a powerful example of how God feels about sin in general, and homosexuality specifically.



Recommended Resource: Coming out of Homosexuality by Bob Davies and 101 Frequently Asked Questions About Homosexuality by Mike Haley.









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Related Topics:



What does the Bible say about gay marriage / same sex marriage?



Why was Lot's wife turned into a pillar of salt?



Why did Lot offer up his daughters to be gang raped? Why did God allow Lot's daughters to later have sex with their father?



What does the Bible say about homosexuality? Is homosexuality a sin?



What does the Bible say about bisexuality (bi-sexuality)? Is being a bisexual (bi-sexual) a sin?









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Return to:



Questions about Sin







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Return to:



GotQuestions.org Home