by
Commentators naturally have difficulty with the queen
mother, Maacah, who is said to have been the mother of, supposedly, two successive kings of Judah, Abijah
(Abijam) and his son, the long-reigning Asa.
I Kings 15:1, 2: “Abijah became king of Judah…. His mother’s name was Maacah [Maakah]
daughter of Abishalom”.
I Kings 15:9, 10: “Asa began to reign over Judah …. His mother’s name was Maacah daughter of
Abishalom”.
Some go so far as to translate ‘his mother’ (אִמּוֹ) as ‘his grandmother’ – although the Hebrew word here invariably
means “mother”. See e.g.: https://biblehub.com/hebrew/immo_517.htm
2 Chronicles provides the same information, but
adds the variation that Maacah was the daughter of one “Uriel”.
2 Chronicles 13:1, 2: “Abijah became king of Judah …. His mother’s name
was Maakah, a daughter of Uriel of Gibeah”.
Concerning Asa and Maacah in 2
Chronicles we are told that (15:16):
“King Asa also deposed his mother Maakah from her position as queen mother,
because she had made a repulsive image for the worship of Asherah. Asa cut it
down, broke it up and burned it in the Kidron Valley”.
Again, “mother” (אֵם) here is sometimes replaced by “grandmother”.
Attempted explanations
Rhonda
Burnette-Bletsch has, in her article,”Maacah”, offered her own possible
solutions to the problem: https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/maacah-bible
The regnal formula of Asa, king of Judah from 908 to 867 b.c.e., claims that his mother is Maacah the daughter of Abishalom (1
Kgs 15:10). This is problematic because the same woman is alleged to be the
mother of Asa’s father, Abijah/Abijam (1 Kgs 15:2). An alternative tradition,
calling Abijah’s mother Micaiah the daughter of Uriel of Gibeah, is most likely
an attempted harmonization of this difficulty (2 Chr 13:2). Either Abijah and
Asa are brothers, not father and son, or Maacah was Asa’s grandmother, not his
mother. Thus, Maacah is the wife of Rehoboam (2 Chr 11:20–23), whose favored
status with her husband ensured Abijah’s succession. This tradition also offers
the variant spelling “Absalom” for Maacah’s father. If this refers to the
half-Geshurite son of David, Maacah and Rehoboam’s marriage would be
politically advantageous. After serving as queen mother during Abijah’s short
reign, Maacah continues in that position under her son or grandson, Asa. If Asa
is her grandson, this atypical retention of Maacah’s title adds support to the
contention that the queen mother was an official functionary in the Judean
court and not simply the female parent of the king. Maacah’s role appears most
clearly to be an office when Asa removes her from her position as gebirah (“great
lady”) after she makes a cult object associated with the goddess Asherah. Ackerman suggests that the primary
and generally accepted responsibility of the queen mother’s office was to
devote herself to the cultic worship of Asherah. Thus, the lack of biblical
evidence for this office might be partly explained by the Bible’s reluctance to
admit Asherah worship was ever part of the official royal court. ….
And, at encyclopedia.com
https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/maacah
we read, again favouring Maacah as “the grandmother of
Asa”:
…. The references to the second Maacah pose certain problems, as a literal
reading of all the passages related to her indicates that she is the daughter
of Absalom, who, according to ii Samuel 14:27, had only one daughter, Tamar.
The above references also indicate that Maacah is the mother of Abijah.
According to ii Chronicles 13:2 (mt), Abijah's mother is Micaiah, daughter of
Uriel. Finally the references show Maacah also to be the mother of Asa.
In order to resolve these contradictions, the
Masoretic Text of ii Chronicles 13:2 must be corrected in accordance with the
Septuagint, which reads "Maacah daughter of Uriel."
(Everywhere else in the Masoretic Text as well as
in the Septuagint Abijah's mother is called Maacah daughter of Absalom.) With
this correction the problems are more easily resolved. Maacah is then the
granddaughter of Absalom, the daughter of Uriel and Tamar, the mother of
Abijah, and the grandmother of Asa. Some of the original confusion results from
the fact that the Bible often used the term "children" for
"grandchildren" and even descendants who are generations removed (cf.
Gen. 31:28; i Kings 15:11, et al.).
W. Rudolph (see bibl.) adopts the view of M. Noth
(see bibl.) that ii Chronicles 13:2 represents the original text of i Kings
15:2 which is now influenced by i Kings 15:10. Then Abijah would be the son of
Rehoboam's wife Micaiah daughter of Uriel, and Asa the son of Abijah's wife
Maacah, who would have been the literal daughter of an unknown Absalom, not the
granddaughter of David's son Absalom. King Asa deposed Maacah from being queen
mother because of an abominable image she had made for Asherah (i Kings 15:13).
S. Yeivin maintains that Maacah is Abijah's mother, while Micaiah daughter of
Uriel is Asa's mother, and that Asa is Rehoboam's son, and Abijah's half
brother. ….
My tentative solution
Abijah (Abijam) and Asa have the same mother, Maacah,
because, as I think, Abijah is Asa.
This is obviously a very bold statement, indeed, especially
considering that, whereas Abijah is said to have reigned for a very short period
of time (I Kings 15:2): “… he reigned in Jerusalem
three years”, Asa reigned for almost four decades longer than that (2 Chronicles 16:13): “Then in the forty-first year of his reign Asa died and rested with
his ancestors”.
What makes even bolder my tentative claim (Abijah
is Asa) are the seemingly vastly different reputations of, now Abijah, now Asa.
Abijah receives a very bad press from I Kings (e.g.
15:3): “He committed all the sins his father had done
before him; his heart was not fully devoted to the Lord his God, as the heart of David his forefather had been”.
By contrast (vv. 11-12): “Asa did what was right in the eyes of the Lord, as his father David had done. He expelled the male shrine prostitutes from the land and got rid of
all the idols his ancestors had made”.
Apart from the common Maacah factor, though, there is to be considered the
quite different account of Abijah in 2 Chronicles, which presents him as a Yahwist
along the lines of a David, or a Hezekiah (13:2-12):
There was
war between Abijah and Jeroboam. Abijah went into battle with an army of four
hundred thousand able fighting men, and Jeroboam drew up a battle line against
him with eight hundred thousand able troops.
Abijah
stood on Mount Zemaraim, in the hill country of Ephraim, and said, ‘Jeroboam and
all Israel, listen to me! Don’t you know that the Lord, the God of Israel, has given the kingship of Israel to
David and his descendants forever by a covenant of salt? Yet Jeroboam son of
Nebat, an official of Solomon son of David, rebelled against his master. Some
worthless scoundrels gathered around him and opposed Rehoboam son of Solomon
when he was young and indecisive and not strong enough to resist them.
‘And now
you plan to resist the kingdom of the Lord,
which is in the hands of David’s descendants.
You are
indeed a vast army and have with you the golden calves that Jeroboam made to be
your gods. But didn’t you drive out the priests of the Lord, the sons of Aaron, and the Levites, and make priests
of your own as the peoples of other lands do? Whoever comes to consecrate
himself with a young bull and seven rams may become a priest of what are not
gods.
‘As for us, the Lord is our God, and we have not
forsaken him. The priests who serve the Lord
are sons of Aaron, and the Levites assist them. Every morning and evening they
present burnt offerings and fragrant incense to the Lord. They set out the bread on the ceremonially clean table
and light the lamps on the gold lampstand every evening. We are observing the
requirements of the Lord our God.
But you have forsaken him. God is with us; he is our leader. His priests with
their trumpets will sound the battle cry against you. People of Israel, do not
fight against the Lord, the God of
your ancestors, for you will not succeed’.
As John
Scarsbrook has rightly noted
about Abijah, “… in 1 Kings nothing good is recorded of him, while in 2
Chronicles nothing directly bad”.
The same writer continues in
his article “Abijah”:
The record of Abijah in 1 Kings closes with a brief
summary of his reign which was characterized by constant strife. The relentless
feud with Jeroboam and the northern tribes was a persistent feature of his life
while his father lived, and this continued throughout his own three-year reign
until his death. Jeroboam was an Ephraimite, Rehoboam was of Judah, they were
of the same kin, yet they were adversaries. It is sad to think that friction
between brethren can be perpetuated and even passed on to the next generation
without resolution.
When we turn our attention to 2 Chronicles chapter
13, a rather different picture emerges.
There is no record of Abijah following in ‘the sins
of his father’, but rather, almost the whole of the narrative is taken up with
just one day in his life, a day when a great victory was won, ‘because they
relied upon the Lord God of their fathers’, 2 Chr. 13. 18. It has been a
feature of battles down the course of history for the army general to address
his troops with encouraging words just prior to engaging the enemy. In Abijah’s
case this was done not only to strengthen the resolve of his own forces, but
from a vantage point and with enough volume to challenge and intimidate the
much larger force of Jeroboam. Abijah’s well constructed oration was based (as
with all good preachers) around three points. First, he challenged the validity
of Jeroboam’s authority by reminding him that the whole kingdom rightfully
belonged to David and his descendents. This was confirmed by ‘the Lord God of
Israel’, by an unchangeable, incorruptible, ‘covenant of salt’, a perpetual
promise, v. 5; Jeroboam was just a usurper. Secondly, he reminded the ten
tribes that the true priesthood of Israel belonged to the line of Aaron and the
only acceptable offerings were those associated with the altar and order
appointed by the Lord. Jeroboam had surrounded himself with false people, v. 7,
false gods, v. 8, and a false priesthood, v. 9. Thirdly, Abijah reveals the
main weapon in his armoury, ‘God himself is with us for our captain’, v. 12,
and because of this he concludes, ‘ye shall not prosper’.
Such fine words would have done credit to Hezekiah
or Josiah in their day, but coming from a man who ‘walked in all the sins of
his father’, they seem strangely hollow. Idolatry was still rife even in Judah
and the legacy left to Asa, the son of Abijah, was ‘altars of strange gods . .
. high places . . . images and groves’, 2 Chr. 14. 3. If our words are to carry
weight, then our life must show evidence of reality. Good practice must always
go before, and accompany, good preaching! All that Abijah said was true, but it
was totally lost on Jeroboam!
While Abijah was rallying his troops, Jeroboam was laying plans for the
battle! A detachment of soldiers was moved surreptitiously to the rear of
Judah’s army. An ambush was laid which doubtless would have won the day, with
Abijah needing to fight on two fronts. But Judah, instead of trying to outmanoeuvre
their adversary, ‘cried unto the Lord’, and, remembering the promise of Numbers
chapter 10 verse 9, ‘the priests sounded with the trumpets’. Surely there are
lessons here for us. When the adversary seems to surround us, when ‘the enemy
shall come in like a flood’, Isa. 59. 19, we have a sure defence and well
proven armour, Eph. 6. 11-18.
The Lord, ever true to His word, enabled Judah to
accomplish a remarkable victory against overwhelming odds. It was a mortal blow
to Jeroboam; he never recovered strength again in the days of Abijah. How sad
that the nation, and indeed we in our present day, so often fail to appreciate
the vast resources at our disposal in times of need. ….
My own explanation of the stark contrast between
the inveterate sinner, Abijah, and the exemplary Yahwism of his oration to
Jeroboam I, ‘As for us, the Lord
is our God, and we have not forsaken him’, backed up by his shattering victory, is to be found in the life of Asa.
Asa’s early reign was characterised by his full-on
devotion to Yahweh (2 Kings 15:10-15, 17-18):
They
assembled at Jerusalem in the third month of the fifteenth year of Asa’s reign.
At that time they sacrificed to the Lord
seven hundred head of cattle and seven thousand sheep and goats from the
plunder they had brought back. They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their ancestors, with
all their heart and soul. All who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, were to be put to death, whether
small or great, man or woman. They took an oath to the Lord with loud acclamation, with shouting and with trumpets
and horns. All Judah rejoiced about the oath because they had sworn it
wholeheartedly. They sought God eagerly, and he was found by them. So the Lord gave them rest on every side.
…. Although he did not remove
the high places from Israel, Asa’s heart was fully committed to the Lord all his life. He brought into the
temple of God the silver and gold and the articles that he and his father had
dedicated [,]
and he had, like Abijah, the greatest of military
success (2 Chronicles 14:2-15):
Asa did what
was good and right in the eyes of the Lord his God.
He removed the foreign altars and the
high places, smashed the sacred stones and cut down the Asherah poles. He commanded Judah to seek the Lord, the God of their ancestors, and to obey his laws and commands.
He removed the high places and incense
altars in every town in Judah, and the kingdom was at peace under him.
He built up the fortified cities of
Judah, since the land was at peace. No one was at war with him during those
years, for the Lord gave him rest.
‘Let us build up these towns’, he said to Judah, ‘and put walls
around them, with towers, gates and bars. The land is still ours, because we
have sought the Lord our God; we sought him and he has given us rest on every side’. So
they built and prospered.
Asa had an army of three hundred thousand men from Judah, equipped
with large shields and with spears, and two hundred and eighty thousand from
Benjamin, armed with small shields and with bows. All these were brave fighting
men.
Zerah the Cushite marched out against them with an army of thousands
upon thousands and three hundred chariots, and came as far as Mareshah.
Asa went out
to meet him, and they took up battle positions in the Valley of Zephathah near
Mareshah.
Then Asa called to the Lord his God and
said, ‘Lord, there is no one like you to help the powerless against the mighty.
Help us, Lord our God, for we rely on you, and in your name we have come against
this vast army. Lord, you are our God; do not let mere mortals prevail against you’.
The Lord struck down the Cushites before Asa and Judah. The Cushites fled,
and Asa and his army pursued them as far
as Gerar. Such a great number of Cushites fell that they could not recover;
they were crushed before the Lord and his
forces. The men of Judah carried off a large amount of plunder. They destroyed all the villages around Gerar,
for the terror of the Lord had fallen on them. They looted
all these villages, since there was much plunder there. They also attacked the camps of the herders
and carried off droves of sheep and goats and camels. Then they returned to
Jerusalem.
The 2 Chronicles account of Abijah, the good one, reflects
this aspect of Asa (his Dr. Jekyll).
But, later, there is another side (Mr. Hyde) to
Asa, which, I think, in the case of Abijah, I Kings is entirely preoccupied
with. It is a case of diametric opposition.
King Asa of Judah, from the 36th year
of his reign (2 Chronicles 16:1) - which period covers a relatively small
portion of his reign - begins a slide which will gather momentum (vv. 7-12):
At that time
Hanani the seer came to Asa king of Judah and said to him: ‘Because you relied
on the king of Aram and not on the Lord your God,
the army of the king of Aram has escaped from your hand. Were not the Cushites and Libyans a mighty
army with great numbers of chariots and horsemen? Yet when you relied on the Lord, he delivered them into your hand. For the eyes of the Lord range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are
fully committed to him. You have done a foolish thing, and from now on you will
be at war’.
Asa was angry with the seer because of this; he was so enraged that
he put him in prison. At the same time Asa brutally oppressed some of the
people.
The events of Asa’s reign, from beginning to end, are written in the
book of the kings of Judah and Israel. In the thirty-ninth year of his reign Asa was afflicted with a
disease in his feet. Though his disease was severe, even in his illness he did
not seek help from the Lord, but only from the physicians.
That is also the Abijah whom I Kings was intent on
portraying.
The size of Asa’s army, “three
hundred thousand men from Judah, equipped with large shields and with spears,
and two hundred and eighty thousand from Benjamin, armed with small shields and
with bows”, compares quite favourably with Abijah’s “four hundred
thousand able fighting men” perhaps at an earlier stage.
These figures
are, of course, quite unrealistic, with the Hebrew word elef (אָלֶף),
of various meanings, being translated - exaggeratedly in this case - as “thousand”.
Very much in favour of the need to extend the
length of Abijah’s reign (into the long reign of Asa, as I see it) is what we
read about Abijah’s impressive deeds in 2 Chronicles 13:19-22:
Abijah
pursued Jeroboam and took from him the towns of Bethel, Jeshanah and Ephron,
with their surrounding villages. Jeroboam did not regain power during the time
of Abijah. And the Lord struck him
down and he died.
But
Abijah grew in strength. He married fourteen wives and had twenty-two sons and
sixteen daughters.
The other events of Abijah’s
reign, what he did and what he said, are written in the annotations of the
prophet Iddo.
Most unlikely all
of this for a reign of only “three years”, especially the “twenty-two sons and sixteen
daughters”!
