by
Damien F. Mackey
According to the neo-Assyrian revision that I have
presented in some recent articles, such as e.g.:
Finding new opponents for the Assyrians at Qarqar
- the formidable Assyrian king, Shalmaneser III, fought the Battle of Qarqar (Karkar), not against Ahab of Israel and Ben-Hadad I of Syria, amongst others, but, about a century later, against Pekah of Israel and his known confederate, Rezin of Damascus, this thereby
- lifting Shalmaneser III right out of a revised El Amarna (EA) period where he has caused revisionists so many headaches, and
- catapulting him into the era of Tiglath-pileser III - of whom Shalmaneser now becomes an alter ego.
- Tiglath-pileser III I have already identified with (Shalmaneser III’s namesake) Shalmaneser V.
All of this, apart from having enormous ramifications
for neo-Assyrian history in its relation to the Bible, and to Assyrian
inscriptions relating to the Battle of Qarqar and associated incidents, must
now affect, too, one’s interpretation of Shalmaneser III’s marvellously
preserved Black Obelisk which is generally
considered to depict king Jehu of Israel as a vassal king at the feet of the
Assyrian monarch.
In our new context, the prostrate king depicted in
the Black Obelisk must be one of the various biblical kings, presumably of
Israel, who gave tribute to Tiglath-pileser III/ Shalmaneser V. Biblical kings
known to have been tributary to Tiglath-pileser III/ Shalmaneser V were Menahem
and Hoshea of Israel, and Ahaz of Judah.
We read about this, as real history, in the following
piece by W. Reinsch (not my BC dates): https://watchjerusalem.co.il/639-king-ahazs-tribute-proof-from-an-assyrian-inscription
King Ahaz’s Tribute: Proof
From an Assyrian Inscription
An inscription
that confirms the biblical account of Ahaz’s tribute to Tiglath-Pileser iii
….
Discovered in
1873 by Austen Henry Layard in the ancient Assyrian palace of Nimrud, the
Tiglath-Pileser iii Summary
Inscription Seven lists numerous conquests and building operations of one of
Assyria’s most powerful kings, reigning from circa 745 to 727 b.c.e. And the 24 x 19 centimeter clay tablet, dating
to circa 729 b.c.e., contains the
first known extra-biblical proof of Ahaz, king of Judah.
Surrounded
King Ahaz was 20 years old when he began to reign (circa 735 b.c.e.), and was on the throne for 16 years. The
Bible states that Ahaz “did not that which was right in the sight of the Lord
his God,” but instead he made idols, sacrificed his children to Molech, and
observed pagan rituals (2 Kings 16:1-4; 2 Chronicles 28:1-4). As a result of
his sins, God caused the surrounding nations to rise up and form a
confederation against Judah.
Both king Rezin of Syria and king Pekah of Israel came and besieged
Jerusalem, but could not break through the city walls. Instead, they moved
south toward Elath and joined forces with the Edomites. “At that time Rezin
king of Aram recovered Elath to Aram, and drove the Jews from Elath; and the
Edomites came to Elath, and dwelt there, unto this day” (2 Kings 16:6;
Jerusalem Publication Society). The Philistines also invaded Judah’s cities in
the south: Beth-shemesh, Ajalon, Gederoth, Shocho, Gimzo and the mining region
of Timnah.
Judah found itself surrounded. As a result of the invasions, it suffered
great losses. “For Pekah the son of Remaliah slew in Judah a hundred and twenty
thousand in one day, all of them valiant men” (2 Chronicles 28:6; jps). The inhabitants of Judah were experiencing
this suffering “because they had forsaken the Lord, the God of their fathers.”
God “brought Judah low because of Ahaz … for he made Judah naked, and
transgressed sore against the Lord” (verse 19; King James Version).
The Tribute of Ahaz
At that time, King Ahaz sought help from the Assyrians. He sent
messengers to King Tiglath-Pileser iii, saying, Come
up, and save me out of the hands of my enemies. “And Ahaz took the silver
and gold that was found in the house of the Lord, and in the treasures of the
king’s house, and sent it for a present to the king of Assyria” (2 Kings 16:8; jps).
This tribute that Ahaz took from the temple is confirmed by the discovery
of Summary Inscription Seven from Tiglath-Pileser’s palace. Part of the
inscription reads:
From these I received
tribute … Sanipu of Ammon, Salamanu of Moab, … Mitinti of Ashkelon, Jehoahaz
[Ahaz] of Judah, Kaush-malaku of Edom, … Hanno of Gaza … including gold,
silver, iron, fine cloth and many garments made from wool that was dyed in
purple … as well as all kinds of lavish gifts from many nations and from the
kings that rule over them.
The inscription uses Ahaz’s full name, Jehoahaz, whereas the Bible uses
the short form, Ahaz. The text parallels the biblical account, in both tribute
and specific materials that Ahaz sent to Tiglath-Pileser. It also describes the
Assyrian king receiving tribute from many kings who were in the confederation
against Israel—this indicates that after receiving Ahaz’s request for help,
Tiglath-Pileser led a military campaign to conquer these different peoples
attacking Judah. The Bible states that Tiglath-Pileser attacked King Rezin of
Syria and took away many captives (verse 9). The Annals of Tiglath-Pileser
mention the Assyrian king receiving tribute from Rezin.
Another artifact, Summary Inscription Four (circa 730 b.c.e.), confirms Tiglath-Pileser’s conquest of the
northern kingdom of Israel.
Since its discovery, the clay inscription has been lost; however, Layard
made a paper mache imprint, known as a squeeze, before its disappearance. The
inscription reads:
Israel … All its
inhabitants (and) their possessions I led to Assyria. They overthrew their King
Pekah and I placed Hoshea as king over them. I received from them 10 talents of
gold, 1,000 talents of silver as their [tri]bute, and brought them to Assyria.
This inscription confirms several details in the biblical account. “In
the days of Pekah king of Israel came Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria, and took
[numerous Israelites cities], and carried them captive to Assyria. And Hoshea
the son of Elah made a conspiracy against Pekah the son of Remaliah, and smote
him, and slew him, and reigned in his stead” (2 Kings 15:29-30). It is possible
that Hoshea colluded with Tiglath-Pileser to replace King Pekah.
These Summary Inscriptions add to the expanding fund
of discoveries that help confirm the historical accuracy of the
Bible. The biblical kings Ahaz, Pekah, Hoshea, Rezin and Tiglath-Pileser all
really lived, Ahaz really did send tribute to the Assyrian king, and
Tiglath-Pileser really did attack and conquer much of Israel and subdued the
surrounding regions. ….
[End of quotes]
The relevant part of the Black Obelisk - that supposedly
depicting Jehu, king of Israel, at the feet of the Assyrian king - is described
by Bill T. Arnold (Introduction to
the Old Testament, p. 237):
Above the
second panel on one side is a caption mentioning “Jehu son of Omri” (Akkadian Iaua mar
Humri). The image in all probability
portrays Israel's King Jehu on his knees, submitting to the Assyrian king .... The
caption in full reads as follows:
‘I received the tribute of Jehu, the son
of Omri: silver (items), gold
(items), a gold bowl, a gold goblet, gold cups, gold buckets, tin (Items),
a staff of the king’s hand, spears’.
Arnold then makes the usual point, that king Jehu
was not, however, a son of Omri.
But, as explained at: https://www.bu.edu/mzank/Jerusalem/cp/House_of_Omri.html
“Contemporary
documents refer to the political units we are used to calling the Judahite and
Israelite kingdoms by the name of dynastic founders.
Thus, in Aramean
and Assyrian documents, but also in various biblical passages, Israel is called
the “House of Omri” and Judah the “House of David” (cf. Isa 7:1). Similarly,
Aram-Damascus is called the “House of Hazael.” This usage continues whether or
not dynastic succession is disrupted, which means that legitimate succession is
related to linguistic, ideological, and cultic rather than physiological
aspects of continuity”.
The question must now be asked, in our revised
context:
Who was the Black Obelisk’s Iaua mar Humri?
I am going to go left-field here, and suggest that
he was, not a king of Israel at all, but was Ahaz king of Judah. Previously I had
written on this:
King Ahaz of Judah is, I believe, a very
good fit for
Shalmaneser III’s Iaui mar Humri.
He fits chronologically, given my identification
of Shalmaneser III with Tiglath-pileser III, a known contemporary of
Ahaz (2 Kings 16:7): “Ahaz sent messengers to say to
Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria, ‘I am your servant and vassal. Come up and
save me out of the hand of the king of Aram and of the king of Israel, who are
attacking me’.”
And he, like
‘Iaui’, paid tribute to the Assyrian king
(v. 8): “And Ahaz took the silver and gold found in the temple of the Lord and in the treasuries of the royal palace and sent it as a gift to
the king of Assyria”, whom he later visited (v. 10): “Then King Ahaz went to
Damascus to meet Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria”.
…
Moreover, his name, as rendered in an inscription
of Tiglath-pileser III’s, Iauhazi, accords perfectly with Iaui
(Iau-haz-i)
(http://libertyparkusafd.org/Burgon/cd-roms/124bible.html):
…. "Iauhazi [Jehoahaz, i.e.,
Ahaz of Judah." Tribute is mentioned as consisting of "gold, silver,
lead, iron, tin, brightly colored woollen garments, linen, the purple garments
of their lands ... all kinds of costly things, the products of the sea and the
dry land ... the royal treasure, horses, mules, broken to the yoke. . . ."
[Luckenbill, Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia, Vol. I, sec.
801.]
[End of quote]
Similarly,
Shalmaneser III had recorded: “I received from [Iaui] silver, gold, a golden bowl, a
golden vase with pointed bottom, golden tumblers, golden buckets, tin, a staff
for a king [and] spears”.
I now consider there to be an
historical correspondence between these records.
Apparently I had also in that piece above suggested an
Omride connection between Ahaz through Queen Athaliah. That may yet be a possibility.
Certainly I had, in my university thesis:
A Revised History of the Era of King
Hezekiah of Judah
and its Background
(Volume One, pp. 372-373), made the point (that others have,
too) that Jehu-ide blood may have flowed in the veins of Ahaz’s son, Hezekiah (through
the wife of Ahaz):
It
could be that Jehu-ide blood also flowed through his veins, from his mother’s
side. This at least is the opinion of Irvine:[1]
It may
be significant … that Hezekiah’s mother was a certain Abi, the daughter of
Zechariah [2 Kings] (18:2). Quite possibly this Zechariah was the last member of
the Jehu dynasty whom Shallum brutally assassinated (15:8). If so, it would
appear that Ahaz had been married into the Israelite royal house. The political
marriage, perhaps arranged by Jotham … would have served to buttress an
alliance between the two kingdoms that had existed during the first half of the
eighth century and possibly had begun as early as the Omride period ….
[End of
quotes]
That would at least make king Ahaz about as good a candidate
for an Omride as Jehu.
Failing Ahaz as the tributary king depicted on the Black
Obelisk, one would need to consider whatever other king (of Israel), e.g.
Hoshea, had been a vassal of the now composite Assyrian king: (Shalmaneser III =)
Tiglath-pileser III/Shalmaneser V.
No comments:
Post a Comment