Sunday, January 11, 2026

Nebuchednezzar, Jeremiah’s “monster”, a vital component in the Book of Jonah

 


 

by

 Damien F. Mackey

  

“Nebuchadnezzar the King of Babylon has devoured me, he has crushed me;

He has made me an empty vessel, He has swallowed me up like a monster;

He has filled his stomach with my delicacies, He has spit me out”.

 Jeremiah 51:34

 

 

Introduction

 

The Hebrew word, tannîn (תַּנִּין), “monster”, used here in Jeremiah, can be associated in the OT with a ‘great sea creature’ (cf. e.g., Genesis 1:2 and Job 7:12), which would be most fitting if the prophet were intending Jonah symbolism here.

Despite the incredible similarities, though, biblical commentators often fail to make any connection here between Jeremiah and the Jonah incident.

 

While this is surprising, it may be that King Nebuchednezzar, on the one hand, and Jonah, on the other, would be deemed historically too far apart for the prophet Jeremiah, a contemporary of the King of Babylon, to have intended any meaningful comparisons.

 

But, according to this present article, the apparent chronological gap is non-existent.

 

The time is considerably out of joint

 

Already I may have managed to alienate critical readers by even daring to suggest that there is no chronological gap between the prophet Jonah and King Nebuchednezzar.

 

For, while the Bible links Jonah’s prophetic ministry to the reign of King Jeroboam II of Israel (2 Kings 14:23, 25), who is conventionally dated to c. 786–746 BC, the Chaldean king, Nebuchednezzar, is thought not to have begun to reign until c. 605 BC.

 

That is, at the very least, a span of (746-605 =) 141 years (plus, of course, Jonah’s age at the time). The sum total would be well in excess even of the 120-13o years traditionally attributed to the long life of Jonah!

 

What the long life – and, presumably, the long prophetic ministry – of the prophet Jonah might at least allow for is that, if he began during the reign of Jeroboam II, his prophetic reach could have extended down through a series of reigns.

Now, one such prophet, who began during Jeroboam II, was still prophesying at the time of King Hezekiah of Judah. I am referring to Hosea (1:1): “The word of the Lord that came to Hosea son of Beeri during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah, and during the reign of Jeroboam son of Jehoash king of Israel”.

 

The long-lived Hosea I have identified with the great Isaiah, likewise long-lived and contemporaneous:

 

Did Isaiah and Hosea ever meet?

 

(6) Did Isaiah and Hosea ever meet?

 

And, given the incredible and abundant language parallels between Isaiah and Nahum, I have extended the identification to include Isaiah (Hosea) as Nahum:

 

Prophet Nahum as Isaiah Comforted

 

(6) Prophet Nahum as Isaiah Comforted

 

From there, it is but a small step to include Jonah, whom Tobit variously calls Nahum:

 

Tobit’s Jonah and Nahum interchange

 

(6) Tobit's Jonah and Nahum interchange

 

All of this has been worked out in more detail in my article:

 

De-coding Jonah

 

(6) De-coding Jonah

 

So, these arguments give rise to a completely new scenario, namely that the prophet Jonah (who is Isaiah/Hosea, Nahum), having begun to minister during the reign of Jeroboam II of Israel (d. 746 BC), continued down at least to King Hezekiah of Judah.

 

1.    Prophet Jonah’s ministry continued down to King Hezekiah.

 

In my postgraduate thesis (2007), I categorically rejected Edwin R. Thiele’s fixing of the reign of Hezekiah to 716/715 BC; whereas 2 Kings 18:10 clearly records that: “At the end of three years the army of Assyria captured Samaria. That happened in the sixth year of Hezekiah’s rule. It was the ninth year of the rule of Hoshea, the king of Israel”. Thus the Fall of Samaria (c. 722 BC) occurred in Hezekiah’s 6th year of reign - implying that he would have become king in c. 727 BC.

 

Commencing, then, at 727 BC, Hezekiah’s 29-year reign (2 Kings 18:2) would have concluded in c. 698 BC, which is still well short of our goal of Nebuchednezzar’s commencement (c.  605 BC).

 

More tightening up work needs to be done.

 

Streamlining the Kings of Israel and Judah

 

In various articles, now, I have reproduced a simple table of which I am very content regarding the later Kings of Israel. Here, for instance, we find it in my article:

 

Getting the most out of the Kings of Israel and Judah

 

(5) Getting the most out of the Kings of Israel and Judah

 

as follows:

 

….

A big part of resolving the difficulties associated with the kings of Israel and Judah for this period is to recognise the alter egos, for instance, that a series of three kings of Israel has been duplicated. Thus, as I have tabulated previously:

 

ZECHARIAH (MURDERED) = PEKAHIAH (MURDERED);

SHALLUM (MURDERER-MURDERED = PEKAH (MURDERER-MURDERED);

MENAHEM (MURDERER)= HOSEA (MURDERER).

….

 

Added to this radical reduction is my merging of the long-reigning Jeroboam II, who does not figure at all in Chronicles:

 

Great King Jeroboam II missing from Chronicles

 

(5) Great King Jeroboam II missing from Chronicles

 

with his supposed father, Jehoash.

 

This era, the reign of King Jehoash/Jeroboam saw the beginnings of the prophet Jonah’s ministering:

 

An Old Testament “Saviour” of Israel

 

(6) An Old Testament “Saviour” of Israel

 

Coupled with so radical a revision of the Kings of Israel there must be a shortening, as well, of the Kings of Judah – not to mention of the contemporaneous Assyro-Babylonians and Egyptians.

 

The outstanding feature of this necessary revision is my collapsing of the era of the great reforming king Hezekiah of Judah into the era of the great reforming king Josiah of Judah. Too detailed to go into again here, it has all been spelled out in my article:

 

Damien F. Mackey’s A Tale of Two Theses

 

(6) Damien F. Mackey's A Tale of Two Theses

 

Hence, I now further conclude that the:

 

2.    Prophet Jonah’s ministry continued down to King Josiah.

 

The final touch

 

Some of the ramifications of this overhaul of biblical regnal history are that characters well-known from the era of King Hezekiah must re-emerge in the story of King Josiah.

 

-         Isaiah (Jonah), for instance, is to be found during Josiah’s reign as Asaiah.

-         Eliakim, son of Hilkiah, is to be found as Jeremiah, son of Hilkiah.

-         Judith is the great prophetess, Huldah.

-         Hezekiah’s wicked son/successor, Manasseh, is the apostate king, Jehoiakim.

 

And so on.

 

Finally, completely bridging the earlier discussed gap to King Nebuchednezzar, he emerges as Esarhaddon, following the assassination of Hezekiah’s Assyrian foe, Sennacherib:

 

Esarhaddon a tolerable fit for King Nebuchadnezzar.

 

(7) Esarhaddon a tolerable fit for King Nebuchednezzar

 

The prophet Jonah, very old by now, will reluctantly drag himself off to Nineveh, with Assyria in chaos, in the midst of a civil war, with Esarhaddon (Nebuchednezzar) desperately holding on only to the city of Nineveh at this tumultuous time:

 

The ‘Jonah incident’ historically identified

 

(7) The 'Jonah incident' historically identified

 

Asenapper, traditional name of Jonah’s king of Nineveh

 

(7) Asenapper, traditional name of Jonah's king of Nineveh

 

The prophet Jeremiah will, at a somewhat later phase, vividly recall this famous incident when likening the all-devouring Nebuchednezzar to the sea monster that had swallowed whole, and then spat out, Jeremiah’s older contemporary, Jonah.

 

3.      Prophet Jonah’s ministry continued down to Nebuchednezzar.

 

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Zechariah was more than just an admirer of prophet Ezekiel


 


by

Damien F. Mackey

 

  

Interpreter’s Bible speaks of Ezekiel’s “young admirer, Zechariah”.

Fairbairn, commenting on Ezek. 21: 26, “Remove the mitre”, says that

Zechariah in his attitude to the high priest Joshua “took up the matter,

as it were, where Ezekiel had left it”. …”.

 Cameron Mackay

  

 

That Zechariah may have been the same priest-prophet as Ezekiel was what I vaguely hinted at in the very beginning of my article:

 

Elihu a contemporary of the prophet Ezekiel

 

(4) Elihu a contemporary of the prophet Ezekiel

 

“The prophet Zechariah has certain likenesses to the mysterious prophet Ezekiel”.

 

In that article I had, however, confidently identified Ezekiel “the son of Buzi” (Ezekiel 1:3) with young Elihu “son of Barakel the Buzite”, of the Book of Job (32:2).

 

Then, in my next article:

 

Some rabbinic literature has Ezekiel as a son of Jeremiah

 

(4) Some rabbinic literature has Ezekiel as a son of Jeremiah

 

in which I further (but only tentatively) identified Ezekiel/Elihu with the Rechabite, “Jaazaniah son of Jeremiah” (Jeremiah 35:3), I was somewhat more forceful about a possible connection of this holy man (Ezekiel) with Zechariah:

 

In that article I also note that: “The prophet Zechariah has certain likenesses to the mysterious prophet Ezekiel”. The textual likenesses are so numerous, in fact, that one feels much inclined to factor in the priest-prophet Zechariah as being, too, the priest-prophet Ezekiel.

And, if Ezekiel is also Elihu, then we may have a patronymic connection between Elihu’s ancestor, Barachel, and Zechariah’s Berechiah (Zechariah 1:1).

 

and:

 

If Zechariah were also Ezekiel/Elihu (Jaazaniah), as I suspect, then he, as the final martyr in Jerusalem before Jesus Christ (Matthew 23:35), really did fulfil Jeremiah 35:19: ‘… shall never lack a man to stand before me’.

 

More recently, I have expanded somewhat on this intriguing subject:

 

Jeremiah said to have been silent about Ezekiel and vice versa - why?

 

(2) Jeremiah said to have been silent about Ezekiel and vice versa - why?

 

What I want to focus on entirely in this present article are the textual similarities between Ezekiel and Zechariah, as many have already noted.

 

Along similar lines, the incredible likenesses between virtually the entire Book of Nahum with parts of Isaiah were enough to convince me, in my university thesis (2007) that Nahum (Jonah) was also the great prophet Isaiah. See e.g. my article:

 

Prophet Nahum as Isaiah Comforted

 

(5) Comparing Isaiah and Deutero-Isaiah Styles

 

The usual view of things, as evidenced in Cameron Mackay’s quote above, would be to consider Zechariah, a minor prophet, as simply an “admirer” of the prophet Ezekiel from a good half century later.

 

But I have the prophetic life of Ezekiel covering the Chaldean and Medo-Persian eras - when Zechariah taught - and potentially beyond that, into the early Maccabean times:

 

Prophet Zechariah marvellously anticipates the Maccabean era

 

(2) Prophet Zechariah marvellously anticipates the Maccabean era

 

Let us read some of Cameron Mackay’s excellent comparisons (1968), as taken from:

https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/eq/1968-4_197.pdf

 

ZECHARIAH IN RELATION TO EZEKIEL 40-48

 

by CAMERON MACKAY   

 

 

MR. MACKAY'S studies in the book of Ezekiel are always fresh

and fascinating. Here the earliest "commentary" on the book

(especially on chapters 40.-48) is found in the prophecies of Zechariah.

 

 

EZEKIEL and Zechariah share century, priestly stock, and Babylonian background, but the 50 years which separate their activities make personal contact unlikely. On the orthodox view that the differences between Zech. 1-8 and 9-14 are accounted for by supposing those sections the work respectively of the young and old Zechariah, his birth would have been around 550 B.C.. when Ezekiel had been silent 20 years-a not very probable dormancy if he were still alive. What the circumstances suggest is that the minor prophet grew up in the shadow of the major's repute, and that between the Return of 538 B.C. and his mission in 520 B.C. the repatriated scion of priests studied his fellow-exile's prospectus with built-in interest in the temple, the desire of his eyes (Ezek. 24: 21) in the land of desire (Zech. 7: 14).

 

In fact echoes of Ezekiel found by Zechariah's commentators run into three figures. In the 18 verses from 7: 9 to 8: 12 Driver in Century Bible notes "execute judgment of truth" (Ezek. 18: 8), "hearts as an adamant stone" (3: 9; 11: 19). "they shall cry, and I will not hear" (8: 18), "no man passed through nor returned" (35: 7). "I will dwell in the midst" (43: 9), "they shall be my people,' and I will be their God" (11: 20 al.)’, "the earth shall yield her increase" (34: 27). Study of the mysterious "seven eyes" (Zech. 3: 9; 4: 10) must begin with Ezekiel's eye-spangled Chariot and seven angels (9: 2; cf. Rev. 5: 6), study of the flying roll (5 : 1) with 'Ezekiel's roll of a book (2: 9). Interpreter's Bible speaks of Ezekiel's "young admirer, Zechariah". Fairbairn, commenting on Ezek. 21: 26, "Remove the mitre", says that Zechariah in his attitude to the high priest Joshua "took up the matter, as it were. where Ezekiel had left it".

 

Mitchell in I.C.C. regards Zech. 2: 8, "After glory he sent me", as a condensed claim of mandate corresponding to Ezekiel's, who after his inaugural vision of the Glory received the commission, "I send thee", and adds that in v. 10 "the prophet is looking forward to the fulfilment of . . . 43: 111,", while v. 13 requires that "men should greet with awful attention ... the return of Yahweh to his sanctuary, as Ezekiel describes it".

 

The critical disinclination to allow chaps. 9-14 to the contemporary of Haggai leaves unaffected their Ezekielian background, now indeed even more marked - not surprisingly as the concern shifts from the day of small things (4: 10) to that of the King of all the earth (14: 9). The oracles against Phoenicia (9: 2-4), Egypt (10: 11), goodly cedars (11: If.), shepherds (11: 15-17), and professional prophets (B: 2-4), the symbolism of the two sticks (11: 7-14), the going forth of Jehovah with earthquake to fight against the nations (12: 9; 14: 3ff.) are immediately reminiscent of the earlier seer.

 

The seemingly superfluous note that the Mount of Olives "is before Jerusalem on the east" (14: 4) is a reminder that there the departing Glory lingered (Ezek. 11: 23) and from the east it would return (43: 2). The emphasis on David's house (12: 7-13: 1) recalls the focusing of Ezekiel's hopes on "David", and the associated introduction of Levites their position in the oblation of 40-48. The fountain for sin (13: 1) and the living waters summer and winter (14: 8) are generally regarded as dependent on the "clean water" of 'Ezek. 36: 25 plus the sanctuary river of 47, while 13: 2, according to I.C.C., is, once again, "simply summarising Ezekiel". For chaps. 9-14, on which the New Testament imprimatur is so marked, the date question may here be left aside, particularly in face of a recent finding that no definite dating can be achieved and that it is more useful to concentrate on the contents. ….

 

Our present interest is in the relation of Ezek 40-48 to the book of Zechariah as it stands, wherein the first part encourages the immediately practicable work as prelude to the vista enlarged on in the second part. The repatriates had rebuilt the altar on Moriah without, it is clear from Ezra 3, idea of acting on Ezekiel's directions: they followed the laws of 'Moses, including sons of Ithamar, i.e. non-Zadokites, in the priesthood (8: 2), retaining evening sacrifice (et. 46: 13-15) and all the set feasts. But adversaries, foreigners deported to Samaria, halted the work on the temple. Then Darius in his second year authorized its restart, but the Jews were now murmuring.

 

"The time is not come for the Lord's house to be built" (Hag. 1: 2). Among the causes of their discouragement commentators point to the contrast of their plight with the glowing promises of Second Isaiah.

 

Mackey’s comment: On the so-called Second Isaiah, though, see e.g. my article:

 

Dr. Chuck Missler refuted idea of a Deutero-Isaiah from John 12:39

 

(3) Dr. Chuck Missler refuted idea of a Deutero-Isaiah from John 12:39

 

Cameron Mackay continues:

 

But Zechariah's contemporaries would have thought more generally of "the words which the Lord of hosts had sent by his Spirit through the former prophets" (7: 12). and the evidence detailed above suggests that Ezekiel as much as, or more than, Isaiah provided the disheartening contrast.

 

Zechariah's task was to encourage his community to go ahead as they had 'begun, both with construction plans and sacerdotal, as step 'towards, not consummation of, prophetic hopes. …. Right away, connection with the temple-vision is made in the reappearance of a distinctive feature characteristic of Zechariah's visions, the intermediary angel who acts as instructor and guide …. In 1: 16 the angel conveys assurance that God's house shall be built in Jerusalem and a measuring line stretched over that city.

….

 

Reminiscence of the earlier seer is apparent both in the angel's words and in the attached oracle (vv. 6-13) which we have seen interpreted by Mitchell as continuing Ezekiel's mandate and looking to the fulfilment of 43: Iff. Driver here notes as echoes "villages without walls" (38: 11). "I will be the glory in the midst of her" (43: 2-5), "I have spread you abroad" (17: 21). ''they shall be a spoil to those that served them" (39: 10), and his, "I will dwell in the midst of thee" (43: 9). ….

 

In consonance the final chapter repeats in "Jerusalem shall dwell securely" (v. 11) a favourite Ezekielian phrase used of those dwelling in unwalled villages on the mountains of Israel (3S: S. 11). ….

[End of quotes]

 

And there are many more such comparisons to be read as Cameron Mackay’s article continues.

 

But he is by no means the only one to have observed such likenesses between the text of Ezekiel and that of the Book of Zechariah. See also, for example:

 

https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/EJC85605

 

An abundance of living waters: The intertextual relationship between Zechariah 14:8 and Ezekiel 47:1-12

 

M D Terblanche (UFS)

 

ABSTRACT

 

Zechariah 14:8 and Ezekiel 47:1-12 have more in common than an allusion to a common stock of images. Consequently our understanding of Zechariah 14:8 can be fruitfully informed by the perspectives of the study of intertextuality. This paper considers the question whether the author of Zechariah 14:8 wanted to replace Ezekiel 47:1-12. He seemingly assumes that the reader is acquainted with the latter text.

 

Although one cannot speak of the displacement of Ezekiel 47:1-12, Zechariah 14:1-15 seems to be a commentary on the former text. The author of Zechariah 14:1-15 deems the transformation of the known natural order vital for the fulfilment of the expectations raised by Ezekiel 47:1-12.

 

And, again:

 

https://www.prophecyproof.org/ezekiel-7-vs-zechariah-122-end-times/

Ezekiel 7 vs Zechariah 12:2: End Times Comparison

 

The following article, much to be recommended in full, is absolutely replete with such relevant with comparisons:

 

(5) ZECHARIAH'S SPIES AND EZEKIEL'S CHERUBIM

ZECHARIAH'S SPIES AND EZEKIEL'S CHERUBIM

By Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer

 

1

ZECHARIAH’S SPIES AND EZEKIEL’S CHERUBIM

Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer

 

1. Introduction

 

There are many literary links between Zechariah’s vision report (Zech

1:7–6:8) and the book of Ezekiel. This study focuses on but one of these

links, namely the similarity between the various descriptions of the

cherubim in the book of Ezekiel and the description of the horses and the

riders in Zechariah’s vision report. As this study will show, the overall

similarity, both graphic and conceptual, between these descriptions

suggests that Ezekiel’s portrayal of the cherubim influenced the literary

representations of the horses in Zechariah’s vision report.

 

I shall begin by determining the likelihood that the author of Zech-

ariah’s vision report was familiar with the book of Ezekiel. Thereafter, I

shall address two general parallels between Ezekiel’s cherubim and

Zechariah’s horses and riders: (1) the shared setting of both groups, that

is, the heavenly court and the divine council, and (2) the shared task of

both groups, namely, to function as God’s military servants who execute

his commands. Turning then to the more specific aspects of comparison,

I shall first discuss three visual and conceptual points of contact between

the description of Ezekiel’s cherubim and that of Zechariah’s patrols:

 

The concept of God’s spirit/wind,

The concept of chariots,

The word “eyes.”

 

Secondly, using the book of Job as a third element of comparison, we

shall look at the shared theme of God’s rebelling scout:

 

The satan of Job, the patrols of Zechariah, and the cherubim of

Ezekiel are all patrolling forces who report their findings to the

heavenly council.

 

All three texts contain either the outright idea of a “fallen”

member of the heavenly council (the cherub in Ezek 28:14) or

the seed to such a thought (the satan in Job 1–2 and Zech 3:1–2).

Lastly, we shall compare the attitude towards the high priest found in

Ezek 28:11–19 and Zech 3. ….