Thursday, December 5, 2013

Question of the Historicity of the Book of Esther

 
In“The Hadassah File”, Herb Storck has written (pp. 1-2):
 
The question as to which king is meant by the name Ahasuerus has been met with an impressive list of candidates over the centuries. Every King from Cyaxares I, ca. 600 B.C., to Artaxerxes III, ca. 350 B.C., has been advanced in solution to this dilemma. … [An assessment of these views can be found by L. B. Paton in the International Critical Commentary(ICC) “Esther”, p. 51-54].
 
The modern identification has fallen upon Xerxes, king of Persia from 486-465 B.C., this contention having been linguistically established. The name Ahasuerus has been demonstrated to be the equivalent of Xerxes …. [For a discussion in this connection I refer you to William H. Shea, “Esther and History”, Andrews University Seminary Studies 14 (1976) p. 227-46 and C. Moore, “Archaeology and the Book of Esther”, Biblical Archaeologist 38 (1975) p. 70].
 
 
The question is far from being settled.
[End of quote]



We (AMAIC) hope to have begun the settlement of this question.

See our: http://bookofesther-amaic.blogspot.com.au/2013/11/is-book-of-esther-real-history.html

and: http://bookofesther-amaic.blogspot.com.au/2013/11/is-book-of-esther-real-history-part-two.html

and: http://bookofesther-amaic.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/is-book-of-esther-real-history-part.html

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

The Good News of 'Evangelii Gaudium'.

 
A copy of the apostolic exhortation "Evangelii Gaudium" ("The Joy of the Gospel") by Pope Francis at a news conference at the Vatican on Tuesday. (CNS/Reuters/Alessandro Bianchi)
  
'Evangelii Gaudium' amounts to Francis'
'I Have a Dream' speech
 
|
Analysis
Dreams can be powerful things, especially when articulated by leaders with the realistic capacity to translate them into action. That was the case 50 years ago with Martin Luther King Jr.'s famous "I Have a Dream" speech, and it also seems to be the ambition of Pope Francis' bold new apostolic exhortation, "The Joy of the Gospel."
In effect, the 224-page document, titled in Latin Evangelii Gaudium and released by the Vatican Tuesday, is a vision statement about the kind of community Francis wants Catholicism to be: more missionary, more merciful, and with the courage to change.
Francis opens with a dream.
"I dream of a 'missionary option,' " Francis writes, "that is, a missionary impulse capable of transforming everything, so that the church's customs, ways of doing things, times and schedules, language and structures can be suitably channeled for the evangelization of today's world, rather than for her self-preservation."
In particular, Francis calls for a church marked by a special passion for the poor and for peace.
NCR's work is possible thanks to the generosity of people like you. .... 
The theme of change permeates the document. The pope says rather than being afraid of "going astray," what the church ought to fear instead is "remaining shut up within structures that give us a false sense of security, within rules that make us harsh judges" and "within habits that make us feel safe."
Though Francis released an encyclical letter titled Lumen Fidei in June, that text was based largely on a draft prepared by Benedict XVI. "The Joy of the Gospel," designed as a reflection on the October 2012 Synod of Bishops on new evangelization, thus represents the new pope's real debut as an author.
Early reaction suggests it's a tour de force.
The text comes with Francis' now-familiar flashes of homespun language. Describing an upbeat tone as a defining Christian quality, for instance, he writes that "an evangelizer must never look like someone who has just come back from a funeral!"
At another point, Francis insists that "the church is not a tollhouse." Instead, he says, "it is the house of the Father, where there is a place for everyone." At another point, he quips that "the confessional must not be a torture chamber," but rather "an encounter with the Lord's mercy which spurs us to on to do our best."
Francis acknowledges that realizing his dream will require "a reform of the church," stipulating that "what I am trying to express here has a programmatic significance and important consequences."
Though he doesn't lay out a comprehensive blueprint for reform, he goes beyond mere hints to fairly blunt indications of direction:
  • He calls for a "conversion of the papacy," saying he wants to promote "a sound decentralization" and candidly admitting that in recent years "we have made little progress" on that front.
  • He suggests that bishops' conferences ought to be given "a juridical status ... including genuine doctrinal authority." In effect, that would amount to a reversal of a 1998 Vatican ruling under John Paul II that only individual bishops in concert with the pope, and not episcopal conferences, have such authority.
  • Francis says the Eucharist "is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak," insisting that "the doors of the sacraments" must not "be closed for simply any reason." His language could have implications not only for divorced and remarried Catholics, but also calls for refusing the Eucharist to politicians or others who do not uphold church teaching on some matters.
  • He calls for collaborative leadership, saying bishops and pastors must use "the means of participation proposed in the Code of Canon Law and other forms of pastoral dialogue, out of a desire to listen to everyone and not simply to those who would tell him what he would like to hear."
  • Francis criticizes forces within the church who seem to lust for "veritable witch hunts," asking rhetorically, "Whom are we going to evangelize if this is the way we act?"
  • He cautions against "ostentatious preoccupation" for liturgy and doctrine as opposed to ensuring that the Gospel has "a real impact" on people and engages "the concrete needs of the present time."

 
On two specific matters, however, Francis rules out change: the ordination of women to the priesthood, though he calls for "a more incisive female presence" in decision-making roles, and abortion.
Francis says the church's defense of unborn life "cannot be expected to change" because it's "closely linked to the defense of each and every other human right."
The pope's toughest language comes in a section of the document arguing that solidarity with the poor and the promotion of peace are constituent elements of what it means to be a missionary church.
Francis denounces what he calls a "crude and naïve trust" in the free market, saying that left to its own devices, the market too often fosters a "throw-away culture" in which certain categories of people are seen as disposable. He rejects what he describes as an "invisible and almost virtual" economic "tyranny."
Specifically, Francis calls on the church to oppose spreading income inequality and unemployment, as well as to advocate for stronger environmental protection and against armed conflict.
In the end, "The Joy of the Gospel" amounts to a forceful call for a more missionary Catholicism in the broadest sense. The alternative, Francis warns, is not pleasant.
"We do not live better when we flee, hide, refuse to share, stop giving and lock ourselves up in our own comforts," he writes. "Such a life is nothing less than slow suicide."

Editor's note: Excerpts of Evangelii Gaudium will be posted to The Francis Chronicles over the next few days, and watch the NCR Today and Distinctly Catholic blogs for commentary on the apostolic exhortation.

[John L. Allen Jr. is NCR senior correspondent. His email address is jallen@ncronline.org. Follow him on Twitter: @JohnLAllenJr.]



Friday, October 25, 2013

"... learning to look again at the world through the eyes of biblical faith". George Weigel.



Taken from: http://www.christianpost.com/news/pope-francis-reminds-us-we-live-in-an-increasingly-cold-world-catholic-theologian-george-weigel-says-107425/

Pope Francis Reminds Us We Live in an Increasingly Cold World, Catholic Theologian George Weigel Says

George Weigel
  • (Photo: The Christian Post/Napp Nazworth)
    George Weigel, distinguished senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, addressing the Catholic Information Center's second annual "Blessed John Paul II Award Dinner for the New Evangelization," Oct. 22, 2013, Washington, D.C.
  • George Weigel
    (Photo: Ethics and Public Policy Center)
    George Weigel, distinguished senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of Evangelical Catholicism: Deep Reform in the 21st-Century Church.
  • Pope Francis at Vargihna
    (PHOTO: commons.wikimedia.org)

1/3

By Napp Nazworth, Christian Post Reporter
October 25, 2013|10:12 am
WASHINGTON - One of Pope Francis' messages is that the world is becoming increasingly cold, not cold in the meteorological sense, but in a relational sense, George Weigel, distinguished senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, explained in his Tuesday address to the Catholic Information Center's second annual "Blessed John Paul II Award Dinner for the New Evangelization."
"Pope Francis has reminded us, as indeed his two noble predecessors reminded us, we're living in an increasingly cold world. Not cold because of Canadian air flows. But cold because of a tendency to measure human beings by their utility rather than their dignity. To walk past those who are 'other.' To fail to at least attempt to understand why others fail to perceive the world as we do," he said.
Culture is becoming "increasingly unreal," Weigel believes. In this "new gnosticism," "everything is plastic and malleable" and "anything goes." Citing examples of the right to life, from conception to natural death, and the redefinition of marriage, Weigel said that this culture "not only permits unreality but now is beginning to legally require it."
To provide another example, Weigel recalled a law passed in Spain about six years ago saying that one could change their gender identity on their driver's license simply by signing an affidavit. No surgery or hormonal therapy was required.
Christians can learn to meet the challenge of this new cold world, Weigel said, by "living inside a biblical optic on the world."
Weigel recalled Pope John Paul II's trip to Israel for the "Great Jubilee" of 2000. The purpose of the trip was "to hear again the Great Commission," said Weigel, who was John Paul II's official biographer.
The Great Commission was not just for the disciples, he explained, but for all Christians. "Everyone is baptized into the Great Commission."
John Paul II "carried us back to the Holy Land," he recalled, "so that we could be inspired by those first witnesses to live lives of such compassion, decency, charity and nobility, that others would be compelled to ask us, 'how can you live like that?' And then we, like the first witnesses, could say, 'we have been empowered to live that way by the grace of God, manifest to us through friendship with the Lord Jesus Christ.'
"This learning to look again at the world through the eyes of biblical faith is essential to meeting the challenges of this moment, this country, and this culture."

Contact: napp.nazworth@christianpost.com, @NappNazworth (Twitter)

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

The Two Josephs





 
Taken from: http://www.fatherpeffley.org/docs/twojosephs.pdf


 By Rev. Francis J. Peffley






What's in a name? Do people with the same name sometimes have much in

common? We can look at two famous men in the Bible, both named Joseph, and see their

similarities.

Joseph of the Old Testament is the first Joseph. The Church refers to him as a type, or

foreshadowing, of Christ. But many saints hold that the first Joseph is also a

prefigurement for St. Joseph. Let us consider ten parallels between Joseph of the Old

Testament and St. Joseph.





First, both of them had a father named Jacob


. Remember the biblical references to





the great patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? Jacob's son was Joseph. Matthew's

gospel, which traces the family tree of Jesus, says that Jacob was the father of Joseph,

the husband of Mary of whom Christ was born.





The second parallel is that both of them were royalty


. The first Joseph was a





patriarch, following the great line of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He was the last and

perhaps the greatest of the Old Testament patriarchs. St. Joseph also was royalty since

he was a descendant of King David. Some Scripture scholars speculate that if Rome had

not occupied Palestine at the time, and if the Davidic line was still intact, St. Joseph would

have been eligible for the throne.





The third parallel between the first Joseph and St. Joseph is that both of them

suffered and put up with the difficulties of their daily life without complaint


. The first





Joseph was minding his own business going out into the fields to see his brothers, and

they plotted to kill him. They seized him, stripped him and threw him into a well. Then,

when they saw a caravan of gypsies going to Egypt, they sold him into slavery. Joseph

could have said, "Lord, here I am; a good man. Why are you allowing this suffering in my

life?" Isn't that what we say at times? When we have difficult times in our life, we often ask

"God, why me? What have I done wrong?" But, sometimes God allows us to go through

suffering and pain for a greater good, just as he did with Joseph in Egypt. Because

Joseph was able to interpret Pharaoh’s dreams, Pharaoh made him lord and ruler over his

house. Joseph, formerly a shepherd boy, was now one of the most important men in

Egypt.

St. Joseph had to go through many sufferings as well. Mary was well along in her

pregnancy when, as members of the House of David, they had to journey to Bethlehem to

take part in the census ordered by the Roman rulers. That involved a difficult journey of

perhaps 85 miles on a donkey with no advance lodging reservations. But Joseph obeyed

the law. He went and could find no lodging since Bethlehem was packed with other

visitors who came for the same purpose. He kept knocking at the doors, but found no

room. Think what was going through Joseph's mind. He was the husband, the provider,

and knew that Mary's child was of divine origin. Finally, they found a cave in the

countryside where the shepherds tended their sheep, and Jesus was born in a place

where animals were sheltered. The King of heaven and earth was laid in a manger - a

trough where the animals ate. Think of the suffering, the difficult time that Joseph went

through. But, looking at it, good came from even that trying experience. For example, the

prophecy that the Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem was fulfilled. It was not the

prophecy that the Messiah was to be born in Nazareth. Additionally, the Holy Family had

more privacy in the cave than they would have had in the crowded inn. A secondary

benefit is that now we can sing songs like "Away in a Manger" rather than "Away in a

Marriott."





The fourth similarity between Joseph and St. Joseph is that both left their homes

and went to Egypt.


Joseph was sold into slavery and taken to Egypt. St. Joseph fled to





Egypt with his family to escape Herod's wrath.





The ability to understand dreams is their fifth similarity


. In the Old Testament,





Joseph gained fame for this ability. While still in prison, he was able to interpret the

dreams of the baker and the cupbearer of Pharaoh. When Pharaoh had a strange dream

of 7 fat cows being devoured by 7 skinny cows, he couldn't understand it. Pharaoh also

had the dream of the stalk, which had seven healthy ears of corn. Suddenly there was a

stalk with 7 withered ears of corn, which swallowed the healthy stalk. Pharaoh couldn't

understand these dreams, so he called his magicians but they could not interpret the

dreams. Pharaoh had heard of Joseph's ability, so he sent for him and asked him to

interpret these dreams. Joseph gave Pharaoh the interpretation - that God was going to

bless Egypt with 7 years of plenty, but after that would come 7 years of terrible famine.

Because of this insight into the future, Pharaoh picked Joseph to be the manager of his

house and ruler over all his possessions.

St. Joseph also understood the meaning of his dreams. The New Testament relates

four dreams, which St. Joseph understood and unhesitatingly acted upon. The first was

when he had doubts about whether to take Mary as his wife. The angel said "Fear not,

Joseph, to accept Mary as your wife. It is by the Holy Spirit that she has conceived this

Child." Joseph recognized the guidance in the dream as coming from God and followed

the angel's bidding. Likewise, he recognized the urgency of the message conveyed in the

second dream - "flee into Egypt. Herod is trying to kill the Child." In the third dream,

Joseph understood that it was safe to return to Palestine since Herod was dead. Lastly, in

the fourth dream, Joseph accepted the angel's advice to return to Nazareth because

Herod's son had become king. St. Joseph's ability to recognize the divine guidance sent to

him in dreams literally saved the Holy Family on several occasions.





The sixth parallel is that of being the ruler of the king's house and possessions.





Pharaoh, the king of Egypt, made Joseph ruler and lord over all his possessions in Egypt.

St. Joseph, as head of the Holy Family, was ruler over the King of the Universe's home in

Nazareth. Jesus, the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords, the Alpha and the Omega, chose

Joseph to be the head of the Holy Family, to be the lord, master and ruler over the house.





The seventh similarity between the Joseph of the Old and Joseph of the New

Testament is their purity and chastity


. Remember what happened to Joseph. Joseph





was a very strong man, a very handsome man, and Potiphar's wife fell in love with him

and tried to seduce him. Day after day she would ask him and try to lead him into having

an adulterous affair, but Joseph steadfastly refused. Eventually, she lied and told Potiphar,

"Look what this Hebrew tried to do to me." Potiphar put Joseph into prison, where he

stayed for two years. In the New Testament, St. Joseph is the virginal husband of Mary.

St. Joseph, the most pure and chaste man that God ever created, married the Blessed

Mother. They lived a virginal life their entire marriage. The beautiful virtues of purity and

chastity are thus exemplified in both Joseph of the Old and St. Joseph of the New.





The eighth parallel is that they both experienced poverty


. Joseph of the Old





Testament had everything material taken from him - his brothers stole his inheritance, he

was sold into slavery and owned nothing, and he was unjustly imprisoned for a few years.

St. Joseph knew poverty as well. We are told in the gospels that he was a carpenter, a

member of the working class. When he uprooted his family and went to Bethlehem and

then to Egypt, he probably took his tools with him so he could continue earning a living,

but that is about all he had in terms of material goods. We also know that the Holy Family

was poor because at the Presentation they gave two turtle doves, the offering of the poor.





Both Josephs were responsible for feeding the entire world, which is their ninth

similarity.


Because of Joseph's advice, Egypt was the only country in the world that had





grain during the famine. The other nations came to Egypt to buy their grain. Thanks to

Joseph, the peoples of the world had food, and Pharaoh became even richer and more

powerful. How does that relate to St. Joseph? St. Joseph was the nurturer and the one

who fed Jesus. He practiced his trade and earned the money to buy the food, which fed

Jesus. St. Joseph, as head of the Holy Family, taught Jesus a trade and provided his

initial religious instruction. He helped Jesus grow to manhood and become for us the

Eucharist, feeding us with his own Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. Thus, indirectly Joseph

has fed the entire world with the Bread of Life.





Lastly, we can go to both Josephs in times of need


. The people of Egypt and the





other nations went to Joseph for the grain they needed during the great famine. During

this time of suffering there was a saying, "Go to Joseph for what you need." Because

Joseph had such tremendous influence with the Pharaoh, many peoples' petitions were

answered. We priests, religious and lay people can go to St. Joseph in our time of need.

Whatever difficulties and sufferings we have, we go to Joseph because he has great

influence with his Son, the King of the Universe. Jesus, good Son that he is, still follows

the precepts of the Fourth Commandment and, so long as it is in accord with the will of the

Father, does as his mother and foster father ask.

These, then, are ten similarities between Joseph of the Old Testament and St. Joseph,

two of the greatest figures in the Bible. Let us now recognize how they have experienced

many of the same trials and sorrows we face, and let us follow their example of steadfast

love and service of God. They stand ready and able to help us, if we but "go to Joseph."

Joseph, Son of David, Son of Abraham










I. 2 -- Joseph, Son of David, Son of Abraham



Matthew 1 clearly asserts the virginal conception and divine origin of Jesus, "God with us," "of the Holy Spirit" (Mt 1:18,20,23). The principal concern, however, is to explain Jesus' human origin to both Jews and gentiles. The very first verse states the purpose of the two chapters: "The book of the origin of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham" (Mt 1:1).

Jews are shown that the Son of God is the Messiah promised to the royal line of David. Chapter 1 demonstrates this through the genealogy of Joseph, his legal father. Chapter 2 confirms it by the geography of his birth in Bethlehem, the town of David, even though he was raised in Nazareth.

With respect to gentiles, not always fully accepted by the Jewish Christian community, there is the reminder that the Messiah is also "the son of Abraham," who inherited God's promises for all. "I tell you, many will come from east and west and sit at table with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, while the sons of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness" (Mt 8:11-12). Matthew 1 breaks protocol to include gentiles in the genealogy. In Matthew 2 the gentile magi search for the newborn king to adore him, while the religious leaders of Jerusalem show no interest in seeking him and actually become accomplices of Herod's plot to kill him.

The genealogy that follows the opening verse does not totally agree with that of Luke 3. In fact, even the name of Joseph's father differs in the two: Jacob (Mt 1:16) or Heli (Lk 3:23), although their fathers' names are similar, Matthan and Matthat respectively. There is clearly a certain artificiality in Matthew's presentation of the genealogy in three groups of fourteen: "So all the generations from Abraham to David were fourteen generations, and from David to the deportation to Babylon fourteen generations, and from the deportation to Babylon to the Christ fourteen generations" (Mt 1:17). It was common practice at the time to allow certain inclusions or exclusions to better serve the purpose of the writings. This purpose would be somewhat different for the different audiences to which Matthew and Luke were writing. Since Matthew is so concerned to draw parallels between the New and Old Testament Josephs, it is not surprising that their fathers are both "Jacob," a name used only of the patriarch throughout the whole of Scripture. There is no discrepancy whatsoever regarding Jesus' Davidic descent, nor any room to doubt the historicity of Joseph, his legal father, who belongs to the substance of the tradition shared by the independent sources of Luke and John.

From the time of King David, who lived a millennium before Christ, God's covenant with his chosen people was made through the king of Israel, anointed by God as shepherd of Israel, heir of the promises made to Abraham, and unifier of all the tribes into one people. When David decided to build a temple, God promised him a descendent, a son of God, who would establish his reign forever (2 Sam 7:12-16). Not too long after David's reign, the kingdom was divided and eventually it crumbled, but the messianic hope in the promise of the promised new son of David did not leave the people. The New Testament teaches in many places that Jesus is the "Son of David" fulfilling that promise, and establishing his Church as the new Israel for all peoples of the earth. More than any other, Matthew's Gospel emphasizes the title "Son of David" (Mt 9:27; 12:23; 15:22; 20:30,31; 21:9,15; 22:41-45). His very first task, then, is to begin his Gospel by showing how Jesus is of the royal line of David in accord with the promise.

Matthew's genealogy thus revolves around David, whose name occurs in the first verse (Mt 1:1), ends the first and begins the second of the three divisions (Mt 1:6-7), and is repeated in the concluding summary (Mt 1:17). This summary verse makes a point of repeating that the number of generations in each of the three parts is fourteen, a number which results from taking the sum of the numerical position of the Hebrew alphabet of DWD (4+6+4), the consonants for "David." David is the only one given the title "the king" (Mt 1:6).

The genealogy almost tediously repeats the formula A begot B, and B begot C, down to the very end when the pattern is clearly interrupted. Joseph does not beget Jesus, but is the husband of Mary of whom Jesus "was begotten." Other irregularities, such as the inclusion of four women in the genealogy help prepare for this most significant, final irregularity. This interruption in the pattern is explained by the following verses 18-25, the story of Joseph's vocation, which is strictly connected to the genealogy. The introductory verses (Mt 1:1,18) to both the genealogy and this following section contain the same Greek noun génesis "origin." The connection has often been obscured, since this same noun has often been translated as "genealogy" or something similar in verse 1, and as "birth" in verse 18. In the passage on Joseph's vocation, the angel of the Lord addresses Joseph as the "son of David" (Mt 1:20) and clarifies the mysterious verse 16, by showing how one born of the Holy Spirit is also the Son of David through Joseph, and thereby qualifies to be the promised Messiah.

In Jewish practice, biological fatherhood was not the only way to pass on genealogical descent, since adoptive fatherhood was no less valid. Matthew presents Joseph as the legal father who transmits Davidic descent without being the biological father. Joseph's fatherhood is much more than "adoptive," however, since he was already betrothed to Mary in a juridically binding manner at the time of the miraculous conception. By taking Mary into his home before Jesus' birth, Joseph was merely continuing with the normal final phase of Jewish marriage. The child he accepted as his own at the angel's bidding was not born to any other human father. Conceived not by any adulterous affair, but by the Holy Spirit, Jesus is certainly the legitimate offspring of Joseph's legitimate wife. Joseph is his only possible human father, and he is legally so because he is Mary's husband: "Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ" (Mt 1:16). Joseph is called to name the child, since this is a natural consequence of continuing the marriage and forming a household with his pregnant wife. Jesus the Christ, the divinely conceived Savior, can be recognized as the promised Son of David because Joseph is son of David.




....

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Evil-merodach (562-560) freed Jehoiachin









Evil-merodach came to power in Babylon upon the death of his father Nebuchadnezzar in 562 B.C. There are only two references to him in the Bible, and these are parallel accounts. Evidence suggests that Jehoiachin (Jeconiah, Coniah), the king of Judah who was taken to Babylon in 597 B.C., was treated like a king in exile during most, or all, of his time in Babylon. The kindness of Evil-merodach receives special attention.
27 And in the thirty-seventh year of the exile of Jehoiachin king of Judah, in the twelfth month, on the twenty-seventh day of the month, Evil-merodach king of Babylon, in the year that he began to reign, graciously freed Jehoiachin king of Judah from prison. 28 And he spoke kindly to him and gave him a seat above the seats of the kings who were with him in Babylon. 29 So Jehoiachin put off his prison garments. And every day of his life he dined regularly at the king’s table, 30 and for his allowance, a regular allowance was given him by the king, according to his daily needs, as long as he lived. (2 Kings 25:27-30 ESV; cf. Jeremiah 52:31-34)
It is interesting that we have a biblical record mentioning Evil-merodach’s treatment of Jehoiachin (about 560 B.C.), and we have archaeological evidence of similar treatment at an earlier period. Four tablets mentioning Jehoiachin and his sons date to the period 595–570 B.C.
These tablets record rations that were given to the exiled king, his sons, and eight men of Judah. The one shown here is usually displayed in the Museum of the Ancient Near East (Vorderasiatische Museum), also called the Pergamon Museum, in Berlin (VAT 16378).
A trip to Berlin is worthwhile for many reasons, but one of the best is to visit the Museum of the Ancient East. Even though it could stand some revisions, you should find my Biblically Related Artifacts in the Museums of Berlin helpful. It is available in PDF here.


Here is what I wrote about this tablet:
“Jehoiachin (Jeconiah, Coniah) was the young king of Judah who was taken captive to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC. (2 Kings 24:15). The date of the capture of Jerusalem (March 16, 597 BC) was learned in 1955 when Donald J. Wiseman, then of the British Museum, read a cuneiform tablet from Babylon. About 300 cuneiform tablets, dating between 595 and 570 BC, were found near the Ishtar Gate in Babylon. They contain lists of rations such as barley and oil paid to the captives and craftsmen. Persons from various countries are mentioned: Egypt, Philistia, Phoenicia, Asia Minor, Judah, etc. Some Biblical names are included: Gaddiel, Semachiah, and Shelemiah (a name mentioned prominently in Jeremiah 36-37). The most interesting name is Yaukin, king of the land of Yahud (Judah), along with five royal princes. The name, pronounced Yow-keen, is known to be an abbreviation for Jehoiachin. One document in which his name occurs is dated to 592 BC. These tablets show that the Babylonians continued to regard Jehoiachin as the legitimate king of Judah and gave him special treatment while he was in captivity (2 Kings 25:27-30; Jeremiah 52:31-34). The tablets were read by E. F. Weidner in the basement of the Kaiser Friedrich Museum, Berlin, after 1933.
[For those with access to this type of material:] Some Sources: Albright, BA 5 (1942), 49-55; ANET, 308 for translation; DOTT, 84-86; JFLAP, 225-227; IDB, II:811-13; Werner Keller, The Bible as History, 285-287; Wiseman, Illustrations from Biblical Archaeology, 73 for photo [showing both the reverse and the obverse of the photo above].”

More Recent Source: Fant, Clyde E. and Mitchell G. Reddish, Lost Treasures of the Bible, 217-220.

....

Taken from: http://ferrelljenkins.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/evil-merodach-562-560-graciously-freed-jehoiachin/

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

The possibility that Darius the Mede is to be identified with Cyrus the Persian king.



D. J. Wiseman, “Some Historical Problems in the Book of Daniel,”

D. J. Wiseman, ed.,

Notes on Some
Problems in the Book of Daniel
l. London: The Tyndale Press, 1965. pp. 9-18.

Some Historical Problems in the Book of Daniel
D. J. Wiseman

A. DARIUS THE MEDE
....


3. The ‘Cyrus’ Theory.
In 1957 I put forward as a working hypothesis the possibility that Darius the Mede is to be identified with Cyrus the Persian king.
19 It may be helpful to review this theory in the light of criticism made of it by Dr. Whitcomb.
20 The basis of the hypothesis is that Daniel 6:28 can be translated ‘Daniel prospered in the reign of Darius, even (namely, or i.e.) the reign of Cyrus the Persian.’ Such a use of the appositional or explicative Hebrew wa„w construction has long been recognized in Chronicles 5:26 (‘So the God of Israel stirred up the spirit of Pul king of Assyria even the spirit of Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria’) and elsewhere.
....

Velikovsky Identified biblical 'Zerah the Ethiopian' with pharaoh Amenhotep II



....

In the chapter dealing with the sack of the Temple of Jerusalem, it was demonstrated that the biblical Shishak, its plunderer, was Thutmose III of the Eighteenth Dynasty, and the objects of his loot, depicted on the bas relief at Karnak, were identified as the vessels, utensils, and furniture of the Temple. His heir Amenhotep II was identified as the Biblical Zerah who invaded Palestine in the days of King Asa at the beginning of the ninth century. Thus they could not have been the Libyan kings Shoshenk and Osorkon. These Libyans reigned later ....

....

81. Amenhotep II lived not in the fifteenth but in the ninth century, and was the scriptural Zerah.
82. The theory that the Ethiopian Zerah came from Arabia is wrong; equally wrong is the theory that he is a mythological figure.
83. The battle of Ain-Reshet, referred to by Amenhotep II, is the battle of Mareshet-Gath, which was lost by Amenhotep II and won by Asa.
84. This intrusion of Amenhotep II-Zerah is also narrated in the poem of Keret found in Ras Shamra.
85. The theory that Terah of the Poem, who invaded the south of Palestine with millions of soldiers, is the father of Abraham, is wrong.
86. The Shemesh-Edom of the war-annals of Amenhotep II is the Edomite city of Shapesh (Shemesh) referred to in the Poem of Keret.

....

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

On Setting Down Firm Biblical Dates




Hello Damien,

If you could spare a moment or two free, could you confirm or otherwise correct my dates for Subjects?

I have 951 as start for Asa's reign, battle would be in 936 which would be a far cry from Thiele's 896/895 BCE.

"Zerah the Ethiopian" is Sera I (Tomai) 949-923 of Dynasty of Menelik.

Amenhotep II of Egypt (ranging from 963 - 918 BCE according to Manetho's transcribers) would have an unsuccessful campaign in his 8th year - does this make sense to you?

Any light you can shine on this would be appreciated!

Best regards,

Dick Gagel
Hello Dick
To be perfectly honest, I do not concern myself with hard dates for people and biblical events. I just use circa (e.g. c. 1000 BC) to give an approximation.
The reason for this is that I do not believe that the lower dates, pertaining to Daniel and his prophecies, and their relation to Chaldeo-Persian history, have been anywhere near worked out properly yet, and so it is too early to be firm and dogmatic about any BC dates.
Having said that, my favourite date reference (as an approximation) is P. Mauro's "The Wonders of Bible Chronology". It used to be on-line.
I think you may be able to download it at: http://en.netlog.com/winnifredponce/blog/blogid=26923339
But I suspect that some of this may need to be refined in light of a sound revision.
Are you saying that Amenhotep II is "Zerah the Ethiopian" is Sera I (and who is this latter?)
Regards
Damien [Mackey]

Joseph, son of Jacob (Israel), was Imhotep, of Egyptian History



Taken from: http://theegyptianidentityofjoseph.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/joseph-son-of-jacob-israel-was-imhotep-of-egyptian-history/

 

....

· Barriers to equating Joseph with Imhotep, The Egyptian Identity of Joseph son of Jacob, Who was Imhotep


Authors

Joseph, son of Jacob (Israel), was Imhotep, of Egyptian History


Egyptian History is consistent with the Bible

Joseph was the 11th son of Jacob, the Patriarch of Israel. Joseph was 30 years old when he became the sage or visier to Pharaoh and lead Egypt through seven years of famine. The Pharaohs became wealthy and powerful because of Joseph. Joseph brought up all the land of Egypt (except for that of the priest’s) and reduced the Egyptian people to servitude. He married the daughter of the High Priest in Heliopolis (Capital city ‘On’). He lived to the age of 110 and ensured the survival of the Israelites.

Egyptian history records a visier to Pharaoh Djoser of the third dynasty by the name of Imhotep who lived for 110 years and saved Egypt from a seven year famine and made Egypt very wealthy. He is said to have designed the first pyramid, been the first to used columns in architecture, performed operations and established the practice of embalming. He wrote many literary works and was the first to use papyrus.
Could Joseph and Imhotep have been the same person?

Joseph and Imhotep were the same person


Introduction

This article looks at the person of Joseph, son of Jacob, in the Bible, and whether or not there is any non-Biblical Egyptian historical or archeological evidence of his existence.
Joseph is responsible for saving Egypt from a seven year famine and may have built the massive underground silos that can be found in many cities of Egypt. [1] [2] [3] In particular, he may have built the silos associated with the first pyramid built in Egypt (The Step Pyramid which is part of the Djoser Pyramid complex at Saqqara, designed by Imhotep). [4] [5] [6] [7]
There are many similarities between the profile of Joseph and Imhotep. [8] [9] [10] [5] Imhotep is also credited with saving Egypt from a seven year famine after hearing of the Pharaoh’s dream. Imhotep, like Joseph, was a commoner with some divine connection and was placed second in charge of Egypt by the King (Netjerikhet). [8]
Joseph brought up all the land for Pharaoh by selling the grain he stored during the seven years that preceded the famine [11] ; a feat that could only have been performed once, early in Egypt’s history, and explains how the Pharaohs became so powerful and able to built the pyramids.
Given that Joseph was one of the Patriarchs of Israel, and figures very early in the Biblical record, less than 1000 years after the flood of Noah, it is quite possible that he may have figured in the early parts of Egyptian history, namely the Third Dynasty of Pharaoh Djoser. [9] [12] [13]
Until recently, the most compelling argument against Joseph and Imhotep being the same person, has been the discrepancy between the estimated times during which they lived. [4] [14]
In the last 50 years, evidence has accumulated to suggest that Egyptian dynasties may overlap and may not date back as far as was once thought. [15] [16] [17] [18] Egyptian records are not chronological. [12] Furthermore, the pyramids were probably constructed much later that many historians have estimated. [19]
If this “modern alignment” of the Egyptian dynasties is correct, it is highly likely that Joseph and Imhotep were the same person [20] [21] [22] [23] [18] and Egyptian History would be consistent with the Bible.
If it can be generally accepted that Joseph and Imhotep were the same person, this would give historians an anchor in history in order to further correlate the history of Egypt, Israel and Mesopotamia.

Biblical References to Joseph

References to Joseph can be found in the Book of Genesis in the Holy Bible, the Torah and The Koran.
These are the Holy scriptures of the Christian faith, Judaism and Islam respectively.
The story of Jospeh is told in Genesis Chapters 37-50.
Genesis is the first book of the Bible and no Biblical scholars would dispute the historical nature of this part of the Book.
Any suggestion that Joseph was a symbolic, mythical or a fictional character would be deeply offensive to these religions.

  • Biblical Genealogy

After the Flood [24] and the dispersion of Babel [25] , people spread out over all the Earth.
Terah set out from Ur of the Chaldeans with his Son Abraham to go to Canaan but stopped at Haran. [26]
This is where Abraham was called by God. God promised to make him into a great nation and to bless all nations through him. [27]
God made a covenant with Abraham and promised him the land of Canaan which his descendants would take possession of after serving as slaves in a foreign land (Egypt) for 400 years (4 generations). [28]
Abraham was to become the father of many nations centered around the middle east as we know it today.
He had Ishmael (Ishmaelites) to Hagar, his wife’s maid servant. [29] Ishmael became the Patriach of the Islamic religion.
Then at the age of 100 Abraham had Issac to his wife Sarai. [30]
It was to be thru Issac that God would fulfill his promise to Abraham and so Ishmael was sent away. [31]
Issac married Rebeka who bore Esau (the Edomites) and Jacob (the Israelites). Abraham had a third wife Keturah who bore many children who were sent to the middle east and became fathers of nations there too. [32]
Jacob eventually bore 12 sons and a daughter. The eleventh son was Joseph. Joseph was the first son of Rachael (Jacob’s second wife). [33] Jacob had an encounter with God one night and was renamed Israel. [34] His descendants (the Jews) became the Nation of Israel (from which comes Judaism) out of which came Christ (Christianity) with whom God would fulfill his promise to Abraham. [35]
Genealogy of Noah (according to the Bible)

Genealogy of Noah (according to the Bible)

Genealogy of Abraham (according to the Bible)

Genealogy of Abraham (according to the Bible)


  • Biblical History

In the Biblical account, (Genesis 37-50) Joseph was the first born Son of Rachael (Jacob’s second wife). Jacob (Israel) favored Joseph over his other children. Joseph had a dream that one day he would rule over his brothers. His brothers became jealous of him and so sold him to slave traders who took him to Egypt. [36] He was subsequently sold to Potiphar in Egypt as a slave and was subsequently wrongfuly imprisoned.
It was in prison where he came to the attention of Pharaoh through his cupbearer who informed Pharaoh of Joseph’s ability to interpret dreams by the power of God. Pharaoh needed counsel about his own dreams and was not able to find anybody from his own kingdom to help.
Joseph was able to tell Pharaoh the meaning of his dreams which fortold of a coming famine lasting seven years but preceded by seven years of abundance. Pharaoh made Joseph second in charge over his all his kingdom. During the seven years of abundance, Joseph was able to build silos in every city and store enough grain to feed the Nation during the seven years of famine that followed. [37]

  • Joseph’s achievements in Egypt

When Joseph was 30 yrs old, Pharaoh put him in charge of the whole land of Egypt. Pharaoh gave Joseph his signet ring, dressed him in fine linen and put a gold chain around his neck. He was given a chariot to ride around Egypt as second in command. Joseph’s name was changed to Zapheneth Paneah and he was given a wife Asenath (Daughter of Potiphera, priest of On). [1]
During the seven years of abundance, Joseph stored up huge quantities of grain in each city from the fields surrounding them. [2]
He had two sons to Asenath, Mannaseh & Ephraim. [38]
Joseph saved Egypt and Caanan by selling the people grain during the 7 year famine. When the people had run out of money, Joseph brought their livestock. When they had run out of livestock he brought the land titles. [3]
Joseph brought up all the land in Egypt for Pharaoh. The priests did not have to sell their land as Pharaoh gave them a supply of food. [11]
Joseph’s family were saved. [39] Jacob (Israel) and his eleven other sons along with their wives and servants were invited by Pharaoh to come and live in Egypt. [40] They settled in Rameses and became numerous in number. [41]
Jacob died and was afforded an Egyptian burial [42] after blessing his children and those of Joseph. [43] [44] Joseph reassures his brothers after Jacobs death. [45] Eventually Joseph dies at the age of 110 and is given an Egyptian style burial aswell. [46]
After 430 years passed, the Israelites numbered over 2 million. They were eventually lead out of Egypt by Moses through the Red Sea (the exodus). [47]

Is Joseph likely to have figured in Egyptian records?

If Joseph was placed second in charge of Egypt by Pharaoh, there should be some note of this in Egyptian records. [1]
Joseph helped to save Egypt and the surrounding nations from a famine lasting seven years. [2]
Joseph would have had to construct massive grain silos for storing grain in many Egyptian cities and indeed, massive silos can be found in many historical significant Egyptian cities today (eg Saqqara).
Joseph married the daugher of one of the High Priests in Egypt. [1] He saved his country from a seven year famine and brought up all the land of Egypt except for that of the priests who did not need to sell their land because Pharaoh supplied them with food. The people became loyal subjects of Pharaoh because of what Joseph had done. [3]
Joseph was, therefore, responsible for making the Pharaoh’s wealthy and powerful. [11]
Joseph served the Pharaohs from the age of thirty. [1] He died at the age of 110 years of age and was given a Royal Egyptian burial. [46] It is quite possible that he may have been involved with the design of the first and maybe the second pyramid.
His family, the descendants of Jacob (Israel), produced mud bricks and became numerous in number in the 430 years that they lived in Egypt. There were over 600 thousand adult males (not counting women and children) who were lead out of Egypt by Moses during a time of great disaster in Egypt. [47]
With a list of accomplishments like this, it would be hard to conceive that Joseph would not be mentioned in Egyptian heiroglyphics or memorialized some other way.

Where does Joseph fit into Egyptian History?

Estimates of dates have long been the common denominator used by archaeologists and historians alike when trying to piece together ancient history.
Various teams of archaeologist have used a number of different dating methods to estimate how old a particular artifact is. For example, the type of pottery that is predominant in a layer can be used to date the layer.
Assumptions behind various dating techniques are not alway right. This can sometimes lead to artifacts being incorrectly dated by as much as 1000 to 2000 years.
If history is pieced together based only upon the estimated dates of particular dynasties, the results can be quite erroneous and it will be little wonder why Egyptian and Hebrew history does not fit together and why no Egyptian equivalent of Joseph has been found using the dates traditionally ascribed to various Egyptian dynasties.
An increasing number of historians are now calling into question the dates of Egyptian dynasties. In particular, Sweeney [15] [21] [19] [48] , Velikovski [49] [50] [51] , Fry [52] [12] [53] [16] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [20] , Reilly [13] [17] [60] [22] Ashton & Down [18] .
Using their revised dating system, the historical records of Israel and Egypt fit together much better and it is possible to identify likely correlates and contemporaries of important Biblical Characters.
Conventional wisdom which has been very reliant on dating methods has been unable to find any evidence that the Patriarchs of Israel lived in Egypt and have not found any possible candidates for Joseph because they are looking for evidence of him in the Hyksos dynasty which is estimated to have been around 1700BC according to conventional chronology. As a result, conventional wisdom states that Joseph and other Biblical figures were minor figures in Egypt that were not note worthy enough to have been memorialized in the heiroglyphic records and other monuments that have been uncovered.
Modern thinking using the revised chronology results in much clearer picture with the history Israel and Egypt lining up and matching archaeological records. Abraham is considered to be a contemporary of Menes. Imhotep is considered to be the Joseph of the Bible and Djoser is considered to be the Pharaoh that he served [13] [17] [21] [15] [52] [54] .
This would fit with the theory that Amenemhet III was the Pharaoh of Moses who oppressed the Israelites making them make mud bricks [18] . Also of note is that the pyramid of Amenemhet III was made of mud bricks containing straw. [18] Amenemhet III was the 6th Pharaoh of the 12th dynasty and lived 450 to 500 years after Pharaoh Djoser in the 3rd dynasty. [18] He had only daughters who had a son (Amenemhet IV) who disappeared before he could become King. It has been suggested that Amenemhet IV was Moses. [18]
The Exodus took place during the Reign of Neferhotep I during the 13th dynasty in 1445BC. He was the only Pharaoh of that dynasty [18]
The Hyksos (15th & 16th dynasties) which were contemporary with Joshua and the Judges, came to an end when King Saul destroyed the Amalekites (Hyksos) [18] [61]
Dynasty 17 was contemporary with dynasty 16. [18]
Amenhotep I and Thutmosis I of the 18th dynasty were contemporaries of David. [18] Hatshepsut was the Queen of Sheba who visited Solomon. [62] [63] Thutmosis III came to power during the reign of Jereboam and became the greatest Pharaoh of Egypt. [18]
Modern’ Chronology (Ashton & Down 2006) [18]
DateDynastyEgyptContemporary_in_Israel
2080BC1stMenesAbraham
1900BC3rdDjoser_+_ImhotepJoseph
1531BC12thAmenemhet_III (6th_Pharaoh)Moses
1445BC13thNeferhotep IThe Exodus (Moses)
1405 -1021BC15th_&_16thHyksosJoshua to Saul
1018BC18thAmenhotep I & Thutmosis IKing David
950BC18thHatshepsut [Queen of Sheba]Solomon
929BC18thThutmosis IIIJereboam

Why is it so hard to piece together Egyptian records?

The Egyptians suffered great losses at the time of the Exodus and may not have wanted to remember what Joseph and his family had achieved during their 400 year stay in Egypt. This may be one reason why it is very difficult to find historical information about the exploits of the Israelites in Egypt.
This may also been the reason that the second pyramid designed by Imhotep was not completed.
Another reason why it is difficult to find historical information is because much of it was lost or destroyed by various seiges, conquests, natural distasters and even erosion over the centuries.
Egyptian records are written as qlyphs (pictures) in stone. They have a number of limitations – you need to know ‘the code’ ie what they mean. Pronunciation is not indicated as with Greek and English and there is no time stamp. The art of interpreting them (heiroglyphics)has been somewhat lost.

Similarities between Joseph and Imhotep

Imhotep – Egyptian records
Joseph – Bible
  • Imhotep is appointed Administrator by Pharaoh Djoser during the periods of seven years famine and seven years of bountiful harvests [8]
  • Joseph is appointed Administrator to Pharaoh for the seven years of plenty then of famine
  • Minister to the King of Lower Egypt [8]
  • Pharaoh .. made him ruler over all the land of Egypt
  • Administrator of the Great Palace [8]
  • Thou shalt be over my house
  • Not of royal blood; attained position by ability [8]
  • From another nation and religion, not of royal blood, attained position by ability
  • Not appointed by Pharaoh Djoser until he had reigned for some time [8]
  • Appointed well after Pharaoh ruled Egypt
  • Given the status of “son” to Pharaoh [8]
  • Granted the status of “son” to Pharaoh
  • High Priest in Heliopolis [8]
  • Married to Asenath, daughter of Poti-Pherah, High Priest in Heliopolis – by custom, would succeed father-in-law
  • Builder and architect [8]
  • Builder of grain storehouses such as at Sakkara step-pyramid
  • Exalted by Pharaoh Djoser as of godly character [8]
  • And Pharaoh said, ‘a man in whom the spirit of God is!’
  • “I need advice from God” [8]
  • Noted as saying, “It is not in me; God shall give Pharaoh an answer”
  • Had great medical skill – was compared to the Greek God of Healing [8]
  • Had doctors under his authority – worked by miracles, dreams and signs from God
  • Decided the tax rate during the seven years of famine; also not to apply to priests [8]
  • Decided the tax rate during the seven years of famine; also not to apply to priests
  • Realizes when he is dying – dies at age 110 [8]
  • Realizes when he is dying – dies at age 110

Who was Imhotep?

Imhotep was a most interesting figure in the Egyptian culture, his name means “the one who comes in peace”. He served Djoser, the third dynasty king, he was the vizier to the pharaoh and they say that he was the high priest to the sun god Ra. [64]
Imhotep is attributed with being the first person in history to be an acting physician, he was also the first architect, he was a poet and also a philosopher. After his death he was given the status of a deity, he was only one of a very few commoners to ever be given that kind of an honor.
[64]
He is thought to be the architect of the first Pyramid; the step pyramid at Saqqara. [64]
He is also credited with the use of columns in architecture. [64]
He is known as the founder of Egyptian medicine, and he is famous for not incorporating magic into his medical treatments, he diagnosed and treated over two hundred diseases, he extracted medicine from plants and he is also known to have performed operations and dentist work. He knew the circulation of the blood system and he knew where each vital organ was placed and what its uses were. [64]
He became the god of medicine and healing, when the Greeks invaded Egypt they worshiped him and built him temples because they saw in him their own god of healing named Asclepius. [64]
Imhotep was also the first person known to use the papyrus scroll. He may have actually invented it! [64]
Among other things Imhotep is also attributed to the prediction and prevention of a seven year famine that came upon the land, he predicted the famine from a dream the pharaoh Djoser had, in this dream the god of the Nile spoke to the pharaoh, and Imhotep was the only one that could interpret the dream. [64]

Could Joseph and Imhotep have been the same person?

The Roman-Jewish historian, Josephus, quotes the writings of Manetho, Egyptian historian: “During [the] reign of .. Pharaoh Djoser, 3rd Egyptian dynasty, lived Imhotep .. [with a] reputation among Egyptians like the Greek God of medicine – [Manetho even wondered] whether Imhotep could have been an actual person .. [because he had] “so many outstanding qualities and talents .. a very special person [who] appears in the history of Egypt.” On the foundations of the Step Pyramid in Sakkara was carved the name of Pharaoh Djoser and “.. Imhotep, Chancellor of the King of Lower Egypt, Chief under the King, Administrator of the Great Palace, Hereditary Lord, High Priest of Heliopolis, Imhotep the Builder..”. [8] [65]
Joseph arrived in Egypt as a young man and married Asenath, the daughter of Potipherah, the priest of On. [1]
This information precludes the theory that Joseph lived during Hyksos rule in Egypt. On or An was the ancient capital of Heliopolis (As-t Tem). Some claim that Egyptians also believed in One Great God who was never represented in their art work. Only his attributes, functions as Creator, Teacher and Healer were known as the neter or neteru. The symbolism surrounding Egyptian deities then is different from this One Great God, in whose image man was made, in that it scales our world and the universe to our dimensions so man can grasp it. The Egyptian name for this `One Great God’ is neter, probably an echo or more distant memory of the biblical Creator God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. [66]
Both Imhotep and Joseph imposed a 20% (one fifth) tax on the people with the exemption of the priests. [54]
Moeller refers to an inscription on the island of Sihiel, near the first cataract of the Nile, which actually links Imhotep to the key biblical element of the Joseph story – telling of Pharaoh Djoser in the 18th year of his reign. The inscription states “seven meagre years and seven rich years”. Commenting on the inscription, Moeller writes, “Pharaoh Djoser asks Imhotep to help him with the coming seven years of famine. All the biblical components of the story are there, and there is a similar inscription on the island of Philae in the Nile.” (This is exactly as in the Bible with Joseph, except for listing the “meagre” years before the years of plenty. Note: The famine years were, of course, the event of significance, saving everyone from starvation and bringing in much wealth to Egypt – it is noted that the manuscript was written a thousand years after the occurrences.) [67] [8]
Pharaoh renamed Joseph ‘Zapeneth Peneah’ [1] which means “master of the school of learning” [66] or “Man to whom secrets are revealed” [54] .
It is also interesting to note that circumcision was widely practiced among Egyptians from the third dynasty onward. Although Abraham did visit Egypt, it seems more likely that this practice was introduced by Joseph-Imhotep in the third dynasty. [54]
Egyptian records show that before Imhotep, the bodies of Egyptian royalty were not embalmed. Instead, they were entombed in early Egyptian structures called mastabas, (or mastabahs), oblong structures with flat roofs and sloping sides built over the opening of a mummy chamber or burial pit . [54]
Djoser appears to be the first king to have be embalmed, [54] Jacob (Israel) was embalmed by Joseph and buried in a coffin and Joesph himself was embalmed and given a royal Egyptian burial. [46] [42] The Biblical account suggests that only Joseph’s bones were preserved as was the practice in the early dynasties of the Old Kingdom. Preservation of the whole body was not practiced until the Era of King Tut (New Kingdom). [54]
Extremely noteworthy regarding Imhotep-Joseph is that the mummified bodies of neither have ever been found. The known facts regarding the burials of Imhotep and Joseph also strongly support the thesis that they were the same person: [8]
Both died at age 110. [8] [46]
Imhotep’s coffin in Sakkara – with innumeral Ibis birds mummified in the adjoining galleries (Imhotep was called “Ibis” because of his reputation for healing – a large number of Ibis birds were sacrificed to him at his funeral in Sakkara); many clay vessels bearing the seal of Pharaoh Djoser were near the coffin; and the coffin is oriented to the North, not East, and is empty. [8]
Joseph would have been buried at Sakkara, his coffin orientated to the North – indicating he did not believe in the gods of the Egyptians (who were buried facing East, the rising sun); the coffin would also be empty as Joseph’s bones would have been taken by Moses with the Hebrews during the Exodus. [8] [46]

Could Pharaoh Djoser (King Netjerikhet) be the Pharaoh of Joseph?

The ‘correct alignment’ of Israel’s and Egypt’s history will allow contemporary fragments of information to be linked together to build up a clear picture of ancient history. Combining the records of Egypt, Israel and Mesopotamia will help to fill in the gaps in each nations’ record.
Evidence is now accumulating to suggest that Egyptian dynasties may overlap and may not date back as far as was once thought. [15] [16] [17] [18] [66]
Dynasty 2 is considered contemporary with dynasty 3. [18] There was no first intermediate period. The dark ages of the first intermediate period have been confused with the dark ages of the second intermediate period. [18]
Dynasties 7-10 have been identified with 15-16 and Dynasty 17 was contemporary with dynasty 16. [18]
Egyptian history, therefore, does not date back as far as was once thought (3000BC – 5000BC) as per the Conventional Chronology. [18] [50] [51] [49] [21] [13] [17] [52] [12] [53] [16] [54] [66]
The first Egyptian dynasty is now considered to have started around 2100BC and the Great Flood is considered to have been around 2300-2400BC. [18]
The Exodus occured just after the end of the 12th dynasty in 1445BC. [66] [18]
Any Egyptian dates before the 12th dynasty are considered quite speculative and are only approximations [18]
This ‘Modern Alignment’ of the Dynasties fits the Biblical account and also the records of Mesopotamia.
The ‘Modern Alignment’ of the Dynasties provides the answers to the major objection to Joseph and Imhotep being the same person (namely the mismatching dates) and by the same token makes it highly likely that Pharaoh Djoser was the Pharaoh of Joseph.
While Sweeney points out that Abraham was a contemporary of Menes who were patriarchs of their respective civilizations some time after a catestrophic destruction [21] , he has probably over corrected the dates which are far too short even for Biblical events.
If it is agreed that Joseph was Imhotep and he served Pharaoh Djoser (Zozer) of the Third dynasty, it does not follow that the identity of Moses and the Pharaoh’s he was contemporary with will be agreed as there is not universal agreement about which dynasties to identify and which dynasties ran in parallel. [58] [66] [19] [18] [17]
Conventional’ Chronology [21]
DateEgyptIsrael
3000BCMenes (First dynasty displays strong mesopotamian influence)Djoser and Imhotep (Famine crisis solved when Imhotep interprets Djoser’s dream)
2000BCFirst Intermediate period(Age of disturbance in nature and general lawlessness)Abraham (migrates from mesopotamia and introduces some of the basic civiliation to Egypt)Joseph (Famine crisis in Egypt solved when Joseph interprets Pharaoh’s dream)
1000BCMoses leads the Israelites to freedom amidst violent upheavals of nature
Revised’ Chronology (Sweeney 1997) [21]
DateEgyptIsraelMesopotamia
1300+BCEarly_Badarian‘Ubaid
1300BCCatestrophic_DestructionCatestrophic_DestructionCatestrophic_Destruction
1200BCLate_Bedarian_and_GerzeanKhirbet_KerakJamdat_Nasr(Early_Literacy)
1100-
1000BC
Destruction episodeDestruction episodeDestruction episode
1000BCMenes (Early Dynastic Age)Abraham(Early Dynastic Age)
900BCDjoser and ImhotepJoseph
800BCDestruction episodeDestruction episodeDestruction episode
800BCPyramid AgeAge of the JudgesAkkadian Age
700BCHyksos epochSaulSargon I
‘Modern’ Chronology (Ashton & Down 2006) [18]
Date Dynasty Egyptian_PharaohContemporary_in_Israel
2080BC1stMenesAbraham
1900BC3rdDjoser_+_ImhotepJoseph
1531BC12thAmenemhet_III (6th_Pharaoh)Moses
1445BC13thNeferhotep IThe Exodus (Moses)
1405 -1021BC15th_&_16thHyksosJoshua to Saul
1018BC18thAmenhotep I & Thutmosis IKing David
950BC18thHatshepsut [Queen of Sheba]Solomon
929BC18thThutmosis IIIJereboam

What implications does this have for Egyptian History?

If the ‘modern alignment’ of the Egyptian Dynasties is correct, Joseph can be identified with Imhotep and Egyptian history will be consistent with the Bible.
Pharaoh recognised Joseph’s divine inspiration and appointed him to be in charge of Egypt. Joseph built silos to store grain and so saved Egypt from a seven year famine. He acquired all the land of Egypt (other than the priest’s) for Pharaoh by selling grain. The Pharaohs became wealthy and powerful and the people of Egypt became his subjects. Joseph’s family was invited to live in Egypt (Rameses). [3] [11]
Joseph, therefore, saved his family and protected the Israelites as they grew to become a nation in Egypt. [45]
Djoser was the second Pharaoh of the 3rd dynasty of Egypt and came about three or four generations after Menes who was the Pharaoh of the 1st dynasty of Egypt and a contemporary of Abraham. [18] [21] [15]
Joseph came three generations after Abraham and was contemporary with Djoser (1900BC) . After his death he was deified because of his achievements. As King Netjeriket of the third Egyptian dynasty was also known by the name ‘Pharaoh Djoser’, it is possible that this name means ‘Pharaoh of Joseph’.
The Israelites stayed in Egypt 430 years. This takes us to the end of the 12th and beginning of the 13th dynasty which is when the Exodus occurred. (1445BC) [18]
It is unlikely that Joseph was some inconspicuous person in the 18th dynasty of Hyksos as is commonly held by people who adhere to the ‘conventional alignment’ of Egyptian dynasties.
What’s more, if the ‘modern alignment’ is correct, the Hebrew influence of Egyptian culture will be re-established. The first pyramid would have been designed by a Hebrew. The Hebrew God can be credited for saving Egypt from a seven year famine and giving the Pharaoh’s their power, wealth and the means to build the other pyramids. The designer of the first pyramid will, once again, be seen to be a servant of the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, even though the pyramids later became objects of pagan worship and Imhotep was deified long after his death by the Greeks.
When the Israelites left Egypt, Joseph’s association with the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was forgotten and the pyramids became symbols of pagan gods.
With the aid of hind sight it can be seen how the designer of the first pyramid, the savior of the Egyptian people and the man responsible for the Pharaoh’s power, known as Imhotep, would be deified some 1400 years after his death once his connection with the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob had been lost and forgotten.
The first pyramids, which were made of cut limestone, were built by the Egyptian people who had sold their land to Pharaoh and become his subjects.
After Joseph’s death, the Israelites were given the task of making mud bricks. [68] [69] Interestingly, the core of the Pyramid of Amenemhet III is made of mud bricks containing straw. [18] Amenemhet III was the 6th Pharaoh of the 12th Egyptian dynasty which preceeded the Exodus in 1445BC. [18]
Moses was forced to flee Egypt and go to Midian after killing an Israelite official. During that period, the Pharaoh died. [70] When he returned to Egypt, there was a new Pharaoh in power (possibly Neferhotep I of the 13th Dynasty). [18]
The Hyksos dynasties (14th & 15th dynasties) started after the Exodus, spanned the period of the Judges and was finally ended by Saul when he defeated the Amelekites. [18] [61]

What implications does this have for Israel and Christianity?

If Joseph was Imhotep, then Bible History is consistent with Egyptian history.
This will mean that there is archaeological evidence that the Patriarchs of Israel lived in Egypt.
Archaeological evidence for Israel in Arabia ⁄ Midian (Jabel el Lawz) in combination with the above would corroborate the Biblical account of the Exodus.
Joseph saved his family and protected the Israelites and allowed them to multiply in numbers so that they could fulfill what God had planned; namely to return to the land of Canaan and to take possession of it after spending 430 years in Egypt and 40 years in the Wilderness. [28]

What implications does this have for Literature, Medicine and Architecture?

If Joseph was Imhotep, this would make Joseph the father of medicine, the first architect to build with stone and use columns and the inventor of the papyrice and the first to use it (to write medical and non-medical literary works). [71] [72] [73] [74] [6] [75]
He probably served more than one pharaoh and appears to have designed at least two pyramids and several buildings that utilize columns. He was given the name Pathotep by a later pharaoh that he served. [54]
Imhotep may have invented the embalming techniques used to preserve the bodies of Egyptian Pharaohs. He became the first pathologist. He was known as the ‘Son of Ptah’ (or son of Path). [54] Hundreds of years after his death, he became deified and was known as the god Path. [54]
Not only was Pathotep’s name derived from that of the god Path, but our modern word, ‘Pathology’, was also derived from and bears his name. [54]

Summary: Joseph and Imhotep are the same person

There is such a strong match between the profile of Joseph and Imhotep that many historians, theologians and archaeologists have suggested that they are one in the same person.
There were only so many non royal, second in charge visiers who saved Egypt from a 7 year famine by interpreting Pharaohs dreams (with the power of God), imposed a 20% tax, brought up all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh (except for that of the priests), lived to the age of 110 and were embalmed when they died. – Imhotep & Joseph
Imhotep was also the High Priest of Heliopolis. Jospeh married the daughter of the high priest of On (the capital of Heliopolis) !
Until recently, the main case for not believing Joseph and Imhotep to be the same person, has been the considerable discrepancy between the estimated dates of their existance by as much as 1000 years!
Egyptian records are far from complete. They are not chronological and the exact way that fragments fit together is by no means certain.
In the Last 50 years, historians have realized that several Egyptian dynasties have been counted twice and some ran in parallel. The result is that Egyptian history can be substantially contracted, therefore eliminating the discrepancy in the estimated dates of Joseph and Imhotep.
This modern understanding of the Egyptian dynasties means that Joseph almost certainly was Imhotep and Egyptian History is consistent with the Bible.
If it can be generally accepted that Joseph and Imhotep were the same person, this would give historians an anchor in history in order to further correlate the history of Egypt, Israel and Mesopotamia.

Suggested Reading

1. J. Ashton & D. Down, Unwrapping the pharaohs. how Egyptian archaeology confirms the Biblical timeline, New Leaf Publishing Group (Master books), 2006. ISBN 978-0-89051-468-9 ISBN 0-89051-468-2 http://masterbooks.net
2. H. Bible, “Jacob bore 12 sons,” Genesis chapter 29-32,
3. H. Bible—”Keturah’s children sent away to Middle East,” Genesis 25:1-4,
4. H. Bible—”Abrahams children to be reckoned through Isaac,” Genesis 21:12,
5. H. Bible—”Ishmael sent away – Isaac the child of promise,” Genesis 21:8-13,
6. H. Bible—”Isaac born to Sarai,” Genesis Chapter 21,
7. H. Bible—”Ishmael born to Hagar,” Genesis Chapter 16,
8. H. Bible—”God’s covenant with Abraham,” Genesis Chapters 15 & 17,
9. H. Bible—”Call of Abraham,” Genesis Chapter 12,
10. H. Bible—”Terah sets out from Ur,” Genesis 11:27-32,
11. H. Bible—”The dispersion after Babel,” Genesis Chapter 11,
12. H. Bible—”The Flood,” Genesis Chapter 6,
13. H. Bible—”The Biblical account of Jospeh,” Genesis chapter 37-50,
14. H. Bible—”Jacob renamed Israel,” Genesis 32:22-32,
15. H. Bible—”Jacob favours Joseph,” Genesis chapter 37,
16. H. Bible—”Joseph sold into slavery and taken to Egypt,” Genesis 37:12-36,
17. H. Bible—”Joseph falsely accused and imprisoned in Egypt,” Genesis 39:1-23,
18. H. Bible—”Joseph able to interpret dreams,” Genesis 40:1-23,
19. H. Bible—”Joseph recognised by Pharaoh,” Genesis 41:1-40,
20. H. Bible—”The Exodus,” Exodus 12:31-42,
21. H. Bible—”Joseph reassures his brothers afer Jacob’s death,” Genesis 50:15-21,
22. H. Bible—”Jacob dies,” Genesis 49:29 -50:14,
23. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses his sons,” Genesis chapter 49,
24. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses Joseph’s children,” Genesis chapter 48,
25. H. Bible—”Pharaoh gives Jacob the land of Goshen,” Genesis Chapter 45,
26. H. Bible—”Joseph’s brothers go to Egypt to buy grain,” Genesis Chapters 42-44,
27. H. Bible—”Death of Joseph,” Genesis 50:22-26,
28. H. Bible—”Jacob moves to Egypt and settles in Rameses,” Genesis Chapter 46:1-47:12,
29. H. Bible—”Joseph buys up all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh,” Genesis 47:18-22,
30. H. Bible—”Joseph saves Egypt by selling grain,” Genesis 47:13-17,
31. H. Bible—”Joseph has two sons; Ephraim and Mannaseh,” Genesis 41:50-52,
32. H. Bible—”Joseph stores up huge quantities of grain in Egyptian cities,” Genesis 41:47-49,
33. H. Bible—”Pharaoh puts joseph in charge of all Egypt,” Genesis chapter 41:41-46,
34. H. Bible—”The Queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Chron 9:1-12,
35. H. Bible—”The Queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Kings 10:1-13,
36. H. Bible—”Saul destroys the Amalekites,” 1Samuel 15:2-9,
37. H. Bible__”Moses flees to Midian and Pharaoh eventually dies” Exodus 2:11-25,
38. H. Bible, “The Israelites oppressed,” Exodus 1:1-22,
39. H. Bible—”Pharaoh makes Israelites find own straw to make mud bricks,” Exodus 5:1-21,
40. “The Wall Chart of World History – From earliest times to the present” 1998 Bracken Books ISBN 1-86256-306-3

References:

1. H. Bible, “Pharaoh puts Joseph in charge of all Egypt,” Genesis chapter 41:41-46,
2. H. Bible—”Joseph stores up huge quantities of grain in Egyptian cities,” Genesis 41:47-49,
3. H. Bible—”Joseph saves Egypt by selling grain,” Genesis 47:13-17,
4. NationMaster.com, “Statemaster – Encyclopedia: Imhotep,” , statemaster.com, 2009.
6. M. Millmore, “The Step Pyramid at Saqqara,” , http://www.eyelid.co.uk, 2008.
9. E. Sweeney, “Were Joseph and Imhotep of Egypt The same man?,” THE GENESIS OF ISRAEL AND EGYPT, B. E. Sweeny (Editor), 2001.
10. B. Rhodes, “Joseph and Imhotep,” , http://the-red-thread.net/, 2009.
11. H. Bible, “Joseph buys up all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh,” Genesis 47:18-22,
12. D. Fry, “Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt – time calibrators,” Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt II, 2004.
13. J. Reilly, “Displaced dynasties,” Dysplaced Dynasties, 2009.
14. G. Byers, “Israel in Egypt,” , http://www.biblearchaeology.org, 2008.
17. J. Reilly, “The exodus and beyond chapter 3: Joseph & Moses,” The Exodus and Beyond, 2009.
19. E. Sweeney, The pyramid age, ages in alignment series, Algora Publishing, 2007.
21. E. Sweeney, The Genesis of Israel and Egypt, Janus Publishing Company Limited, 1997. ISBN 978-1857563504
23. R. Wyatt, “Joseph was Imhotep of Egypt,” , Wyatt Archaelogical Research, 1994.
24. H. Bible, “The Flood,” Genesis Chapter 6,
25. H. Bible—”The dispersion after Babel,” Genesis Chapter 11,
26. H. Bible—”Terah sets out from Ur,” Genesis 11:27-32,
27. H. Bible—”Call of Abraham,” Genesis Chapter 12,
28. H. Bible—”God’s covenant with Abraham,” Genesis Chapters 15 & 17,
29. H. Bible—”Ishmael born to Hagar,” Genesis Chapter 16,
30. H. Bible—”Isaac born to Sarai,” Genesis Chapter 21,
31. H. Bible—”Ishmael sent away – Isaac the child of promise,” Genesis 21:8-13,
32. H. Bible—”Keturah’s children sent away to Middle East,” Genesis 25:1-4,
33. H. Bible—”Jacob bore 12 sons,” Genesis chapter 29-32,
34. H. Bible—”Jacob renamed Israel,” Genesis 32:22-32,
35. H. Bible—”Abrahams children to be reckoned through Isaac,” Genesis 21:12,
36. H. Bible—”Jacob favours Joseph,” Genesis chapter 37,
37. H. Bible—”The Biblical account of Jospeh,” Genesis chapter 37-50,
38. H. Bible—”Joseph has two sons; Ephraim and Mannaseh,” Genesis 41:50-52,
39. H. Bible—”Joseph’s brothers go to Egypt to buy grain,” Genesis Chapters 42-44,
40. H. Bible—”Jacob moves to Egypt and settles in Rameses,” Genesis Chapter 46:1-47:12,
41. H. Bible—”Pharaoh gives Jacob the land of Goshen,” Genesis Chapter 45,
42. H. Bible—”Jacob dies,” Genesis 49:29 -50:14,
43. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses Joseph’s children,” Genesis chapter 48,
44. H. Bible—”Jacob blesses his sons,” Genesis chapter 49,
45. H. Bible—”Joseph reassures his brothers afer Jacob’s death,” Genesis 50:15-21,
46. H. Bible—”Death of Joseph,” Genesis 50:22-26,
47. H. Bible—”The Exodus,” Exodus 12:31-42, .
48. Empire of Thebes or Ages In chaos revisited (ages in alignment), Algora Publishing, 2006.
49. I. Velikovski, Worlds in collision, London and New York, 1950.
50. I. Velikovski—Ages in chaos, London and New York, 1953.
51. I. Velikovski—Earth in upheaval, 1956.
52. D. Fry, “Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt II,” 2009.
53. D. Fry—”Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt II The birth of Egypt,” Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt II, 2004.
57. D. Fry—”Hebrew sages of ancient Egypt – Egypts weather changes,” Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt, 2009.
60. J. Reilly—”The Exodus and beyond chapter 2: The Patriarchal Age,” The Exodus and Beyond, 2009.
61. H. Bible, “Saul destroys the Amalekites,” 1Samuel 15:2-9,
62. H. Bible, “The queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Kings 10:1-13,
63. H. Bible—”The queen of Sheba visits Solomon,” 1Chron 9:1-12,
65. W. Whiston, The works of Josephus complete and unabridged, New Updated Edition, Hendrikson Publishers, 1987. ISBN 0-913573-86-8 ISBN 1-56563-167-6
67. L. Moeller, The case for the Exodus, .
68. H. Bible, “The Israelites oppressed,” Exodus 1:1-22,
70. H. Bible, “Moses flees to Midian and Pharaoh eventually dies,” Exodus 2:11-25,
72. Britannica, “Imhotep,” , http://www.britannica.com, 2009.
73. R. Strachan, “Imhotep,” , http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/, 2005.
74. K. Matthews, “Imhotep,” , http://www.greatbuildings.com, 2008.
75. Wikipedia, “Imhotep,” , http://en.wikipedia.org, 2009.